2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of retinoblastoma mediated signaling to Cdk2 results in cell cycle arrest

Abstract: Phosphorylation/inactivation of RB is typically required for cell cycle progression. However, we have identi®ed a tumor cell line, C33A, which progresses through the cell cycle in the presence of an active allele of RB (PSM-RB). To determine how C33A cells evade RB-mediated arrest, we compared RB signaling to downstream eectors in this resistant cell line to that of the RBsensitive SAOS-2 cell line. Although introduction of PSM-RB repressed E2F-mediated transcription in both C33A and SAOS-2 cells, PSM-RB faile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
46
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
46
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with these observations, livers from AHR knockout mice showed increased levels of TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 proteins and elevated numbers of hepatocytes undergoing apoptosis compared to wild-type mice (Zaher et al, 1998). Second, protein interactions between AHR and RB further repress the RB-dependent repression of the transcription factor E2F and prevent entry of the cells into S-phase (Ge and Elferink, 1998;Puga et al, 2000;Strobeck et al, 2000;Marlowe et al, 2004). Hence, under certain circumstances the AHR could be considered as a pro-proliferative gene with the properties of an oncogene, and under others as a tumor suppressor gene.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with these observations, livers from AHR knockout mice showed increased levels of TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 proteins and elevated numbers of hepatocytes undergoing apoptosis compared to wild-type mice (Zaher et al, 1998). Second, protein interactions between AHR and RB further repress the RB-dependent repression of the transcription factor E2F and prevent entry of the cells into S-phase (Ge and Elferink, 1998;Puga et al, 2000;Strobeck et al, 2000;Marlowe et al, 2004). Hence, under certain circumstances the AHR could be considered as a pro-proliferative gene with the properties of an oncogene, and under others as a tumor suppressor gene.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The AHR has also been recognized as a cell cycle regulator (Ma and Whitlock, 1996;Weiss et al, 1996;Ge and Elferink, 1998;Kolluri et al, 1999;Puga et al, 2000;Strobeck et al, 2000;Marlowe et al, 2004) although the precise molecular mechanisms responsible for this role have not been fully elucidated. In the absence of an exogenous ligand, or after deletion of the ligand-binding PAS-B domain, the AHR has been shown to promote cell cycle progression (Ma and Whitlock, 1996;Elizondo et al, 2000;Chang et al, 2007), whereas exposure to its prototypical ligand, TCDD, inhibits cell cycle proliferation in an AHR-dependent manner (Bauman et al, 1995;Hushka and Greenlee, 1995;Levine-Fridman, Chen, and Elferink, 2004;Marlowe et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enabled us to test various combinations of input DNA using GFP expression as a marker of transfected cells (Strobeck et al, 2000). The ability of these transfected Cyclin D1 protein is normally very unstable with an estimated half-life of 530 min.…”
Section: Cyclin D1 and Er Mediated Proliferationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most evidence shows that AHR activation delays cell cycle progression and G 1 to S phase transition, although this effect seems to be cellular context specific, because in rat oval progenitor cells the AHR promotes rather than delays cell cycle progression (Weiss et al, 2008). A canonical RB-binding cyclin D-like motif in the AHR protein sequence mediates a direct interaction between AHR and RB, and experimental work focused on the characterization of this interaction as the mediator of AHR-dependent cell cycle delay (Ge and Elferink, 1998;Puga et al, 2000;Marlowe et al, 2004;Huang and Elferink, 2005) has shown that the activated AHR cooperates with RB in its ability to repress E2F-dependent transcription and delay cell cycle progression Strobeck et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most evidence shows that AHR activation delays cell cycle progression and G 1 to S phase transition, although this effect seems to be cellular context specific, because in rat oval progenitor cells the AHR promotes rather than delays cell cycle progression (Weiss et al, 2008). A canonical RB-binding cyclin D-like motif in the AHR protein sequence mediates a direct interaction between AHR and RB, and experimental work focused on the characterization of this interaction as the mediator of AHR-dependent cell cycle delay (Ge and Elferink, 1998;Puga et al, 2000;Marlowe et al, 2004;Huang and Elferink, 2005) has shown that the activated AHR cooperates with RB in its ability to repress E2F-dependent transcription and delay cell cycle progression Strobeck et al, 2000).Paradoxically, embryo fibroblasts from Ahr gene-knockout mice also show a relative delay in cell cycle progression, which has been primarily associated with posttranscriptional stabilization of Tgfb1 mRNA (Chang et al, 2007). In these cells, several E2F transcriptional targets with AHR and E2F binding motifs in their promoters, conserved in both the human and mouse sequences (Supplemental Tables S1 and S2), were also found to be AHR targets, being repressed by both E2f1 and Ahr ablation (Supplemental Figure S1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%