IntroductionThe integration of a species' ecology and physiology is exemplified in the adaptive interplay between their feeding ecology and digestive physiology (Karasov and Diamond, 1988;McWilliams et al., 1997;Secor, 2005a). A well-known example of this is the adaptive correlation between food habits (i.e. herbivory and carnivory) and the morphology and function of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The GI tract of herbivores is typically longer than that of carnivores and possesses specialized regions for the fermentation of plant material (Stevens and Hume, 1995;Karasov and Hume, 1997;Mackie, 2002). Equally apparent is how organisms are able to face routine fluctuations in the amount and type of food consumed due to seasonal changes in food availability, ontogenetic shifts in diet, reproductive status and alternating foraging and feeding strategies (O'Brien et al., 1989;Stergiou and Fourtouni, 1991;Koertner and Heldmaier, 1995;Johnson et al., 2001). In response to such shifts in feeding habits, and thus digestive demand, species modulate gut performance to match pace with digestive load (Hammond and Diamond, 1994;Piersma and Lindström, 1997;Weiss et al., 1998). The plasticity of GI performance is manifested in morphological restructuring and/or functional regulation at the cellular level (Ferraris, 1994;Carey, 1990;Secor, 2005a).The adaptive capacity to regulate digestive performance in response to changes in digestive demand is well expressed by amphibian and reptile species that naturally experience long episodes of fasting (Secor, 2005a). Anurans that estivate during dry seasons and snakes that employ the sit-and-wait tactic of foraging, and thus eat infrequently, severely downregulate GI performance upon the completion of digestion, maintain a quiescent gut while fasting, and with feeding, rapidly upregulate digestive performance (Secor and Diamond, 2000;Secor, 2005b). The benefit of this trait is observed as a reduction in energy expenditure during the bouts of fasting. For example, during estivation, the metabolic rates of anurans are depressed by 70%, and the standard metabolic rates (SMR) of sit-and-wait foraging snakes are 47% less than that of active foraging snakes that only modestly regulate GI performance with feeding and fasting (Guppy and Withers, 1999;Secor and Diamond, 2000).For sit-and-wait foraging snakes, the correlation between infrequent feeding and wide regulation of intestinal performance has been investigated for only four speciesThe adaptive interplay between feeding habits and digestive physiology is demonstrated by the Burmese python, which in response to feeding infrequently has evolved the capacity to widely regulate gastrointestinal performance with feeding and fasting. To explore the generality of this physiological trait among pythons, we compared the postprandial responses of metabolism and both intestinal morphology and function among five members of the genus Python: P. brongersmai, P. molurus, P. regius, P. reticulatus and P. sebae. These infrequently feeding pythons inhabi...