1990
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0691855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricted Feeding and Compensatory Growth for Broilers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
32
2
6

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
32
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Summers et al (1990) investigated a 50 % feed restriction program in 5-11-day-old broilers and did not report significant differences in carcass weight, whereas in other feed restriction studies carcass weight was increased (Tumova et al, 2002). In the present study, there was a significant effect of feed restriction on eviscerated carcass weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Summers et al (1990) investigated a 50 % feed restriction program in 5-11-day-old broilers and did not report significant differences in carcass weight, whereas in other feed restriction studies carcass weight was increased (Tumova et al, 2002). In the present study, there was a significant effect of feed restriction on eviscerated carcass weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that during the period of restricted feeding, as expected, the growth rate was less in the birds on a restricted diet than in those fed the full diet (data not shown), but the former did compensate for this when on full rations. It is generally accepted that after restriction, compensatory growth will be attained (Summers et al, 1990;Lee and Leeson, 2001). Feeding a high-energy and protein diet to previously restricted broilers results in better growth compared to birds fed in the standard way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os resultados do presente trabalho mostraram que a quantidade de gordura abdominal não sofreu nenhum efeito ou interação significativa (P>0,05) dos diferentes níveis de restrição utilizados, mas sim, da idade (P<0,01), na qual as aves mais velhas apresentaram maiores quantidades de gordura abdominal (Tabela 3). Summers et al (1990) e Yu et al (1990) também não observaram diferenças na quantidade de gordura abdominal aos 49 e 56 dias de idade, respectivamente, entre frangos alimentados ad libitum ou restritos precocemente. Entretanto, Baziz et al (1996) sugeriram que a determinação da gordura abdominal não deveria ser o critério mais importante para se medir a deposição de gordura nas aves, pelo fato dos mesmos apresentarem deposição subcutânea.…”
Section: Variáveisunclassified
“…Carcaça (g) Gordura abdominal (g) Gordura corporal (%) (2) Proteína corporal (%) (2) (1) Médias seguidas pela mesma letra na coluna, em relação ao programa alimentar e a idade, não diferem entre si pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de probabilidade. (2) Porcentagem com base na matéria seca.…”
Section: Variávelunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation