2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00036-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricted feeding facilitates time–place learning in adult rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the fish did not need to socially interact or spend energy on other demanding activities or stressful situations, the energy requirement hence in the aquarium conditions may have been low and 1.5% may have represented an ideal amount of food for tilapia. Lukoyanov et al (2002) reported that food restriction facilitates rat time-place learning and rats that were fed ad libitum failed to perform the task. Moreover, Widman et al (2000Widman et al ( , 2004 reported that rats augmented time-place discrimination when submitted to an increased response cost task, suggesting that rats are not able to promptly display time-place learning but that the response cost is an important trigger for this kind of discrimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the fish did not need to socially interact or spend energy on other demanding activities or stressful situations, the energy requirement hence in the aquarium conditions may have been low and 1.5% may have represented an ideal amount of food for tilapia. Lukoyanov et al (2002) reported that food restriction facilitates rat time-place learning and rats that were fed ad libitum failed to perform the task. Moreover, Widman et al (2000Widman et al ( , 2004 reported that rats augmented time-place discrimination when submitted to an increased response cost task, suggesting that rats are not able to promptly display time-place learning but that the response cost is an important trigger for this kind of discrimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by 4 days of habituation to the temporal context, Molero-Chamizo (2013) found temporal specificity of the latent inhibition of CTA without considering any restriction in the amount of taste stimulus during conditioning. Although in both cases different processes were measured (CTA or latent inhibition of CTA), it seems necessary to clarify whether a restriction in the amount of taste stimulus during conditioning (and therefore an external control of the intake) facilitates or hinders the temporal specificity of the latent inhibition of CTA, similar to that described in other learning processes (De la Casa & Lubow, 1995;González, Morillas, & Hall, 2015;Lukoyanov, Pereira, Mesquita, & Andrade, 2002). Thus, the aim of this study is to analyze the effects of restriction versus no restriction in the intake of the taste stimulus at the stage of conditioning on the temporal specificity of the latent inhibition of CTA.…”
Section: Taste Stimulus Restriction Temporal Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ad libitum fed animals and animals that were only food deprived to receive 90% of daily ad libitum food consumption did not perform above chance level. Although the use of an ordinal- or interval timing strategy was not excluded experimentally, the authors suggested that food deprivation enables access to the necessary temporal information from the FEO (Lukoyanov et al, 2002). …”
Section: A Literature Overview On Time-place Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%