1988
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a080134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricted LET Remains a Good Parameter of Radiation Quality

Abstract: A suitable physical parameter of radiation quality must represent not only the mean but also the fluctuation of the energy deposition per particle passage through that microscopic site of tissue in which proximity between radiation-induced lesions is decisive for the action mechanism. For sites of nanometre dimensions restricted LET is considered to have this property because (a) the distribution moments j and j2/j of the number j of ionisations per delta ray within the site are almost independent of the type … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data alone do not allow judgement as to whether alternative radiation quality parameters, such a lineal energy in a particular volume (ICRU 1983), Z2/Q2 (Katz et al . 1971), or energy-restricted LET (Harder et al 1988) would give more satisfactory agreement over the full spectrum of relevant particle energies .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present data alone do not allow judgement as to whether alternative radiation quality parameters, such a lineal energy in a particular volume (ICRU 1983), Z2/Q2 (Katz et al . 1971), or energy-restricted LET (Harder et al 1988) would give more satisfactory agreement over the full spectrum of relevant particle energies .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%