2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3560-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricting Choices: Decision Making, the Market Society, and the Forgotten Entrepreneur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This critique is applied to libertarian paternalist nudges, of which it is argued that they are even more prone to abuse than traditional paternalist policies as they operate covertly, making it harder to detect abusive practices (Hausman and Welch, 2010). Several authors mention worries concerning public officials misusing the power of nudges, see Thaler and Sunstein (2008), Blumenthal-Barby (2010), andWolcott (2019).The fear is that public officials and politicians could employ nudges to organize the support they need for political goals (Calo, 2014). Worse still, Schubert (2017b) argues that policy makers have a long-term interest in aggravating thinking biases in the population as policy makers have an interest in a docile and following citizenship.…”
Section: Abuse and Public Choice Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This critique is applied to libertarian paternalist nudges, of which it is argued that they are even more prone to abuse than traditional paternalist policies as they operate covertly, making it harder to detect abusive practices (Hausman and Welch, 2010). Several authors mention worries concerning public officials misusing the power of nudges, see Thaler and Sunstein (2008), Blumenthal-Barby (2010), andWolcott (2019).The fear is that public officials and politicians could employ nudges to organize the support they need for political goals (Calo, 2014). Worse still, Schubert (2017b) argues that policy makers have a long-term interest in aggravating thinking biases in the population as policy makers have an interest in a docile and following citizenship.…”
Section: Abuse and Public Choice Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While acts of decision-making in an environment of growing choices increase the potential to achieve objectively better, i.e., higher quality, more useful, or more advantageous outcomes, they often instead paradoxically awaken feelings of uncertainty, anxiety, internal tension, disappointment, remorse, or regret [33,34]. The thesis of a relationship between the escalation of the range of options, the growth of demands for continuous decision-making, and the increasing level of consumer dissatisfaction is also considered at a more general level by other authors [35][36][37].…”
Section: The Ambivalence Of Freedom Of Choicementioning
confidence: 99%