Differences in biological activities (hemagglutination, hemolytic, leukotoxic, and virulence) and ribotypes between the two subspecies of Fusobacterium necrophorum of bovine ruminal and liver abscess origins were investigated. Hemagglutination activity was present in all hepatic, but only some ruminal, strains of Fusobacterium necrophorum subsp. necrophorum. Ruminal F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum had low leukotoxin titers yet was virulent in mice. Fusobacterium necrophorum subsp. funduliforme of hepatic or ruminal origin had no hemagglutination activity, had low hemolytic and leukotoxic activities, and was less virulent to mice. For ribotyping, chromosomal DNAs of 10 F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum and 11 F. necrophorum subsp. funduliforme isolates were digested with restriction endonucleases (EcoRI, EcoRV, SalI, PstI, and HaeIII) and examined by restriction fragment length polymorphisms after hybridizing with a digoxigenin-labeled cDNA probe transcribed from a mixture of 16 and 23S rRNAs from Escherichia coli. The most discriminating restriction endonuclease enzyme for ribotyping was EcoRI. The presence or absence of two distinct bands of 2.6 and 4.3 kb differentiated the two subspecies. Regardless of the origin, only F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum, a virulent subspecies, had a ca. 2.6-kb band, whereas F. necrophorum subsp. funduliforme, a less virulent subspecies, had a ca. 4.3-kb band. Ribotyping appears to be a useful technique to genetically differentiate the two subspecies of F. necrophorum. Fusobacterium necrophorum, a gram-negative, pleomorphically rod-shaped, and anaerobic bacterium, is associated with a wide variety of necrotic lesions (necrobacillosis) in animals and humans (16, 18, 20). It is the primary etiologic agent of liver abscesses and foot rot in feedlot cattle (11, 20, 29). Two major biotypes or subspecies of F. necrophorum-biotype A, or Fusobacterium necrophorum subsp. necrophorum, and biotype B, or Fusobacterium necrophorum subsp. funduliforme-are involved in liver abscesses of cattle (20, 29). The classification is based on cellular and colonial morphology, growth characteristics in a broth medium, toxin (leukotoxin and hemolysin) production, virulence in mice, and ability to agglutinate chicken erythrocytes (4, 21, 31, 38). Also, differences in the production of certain extracellular enzymes (DNase, alkaline phosphatase, and lipase) have been reported (2, 30, 38). However, in some instances, the difference between the two subspecies, particularly in relation to biological activity, was less defined (38). Differences at the genetic level between the two subspecies based on DNA-DNA homology have been reported (31). However, this method lacks the ability to differentiate strains within a given subspecies and is not useful for epidemiological purposes. DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, using a novel repeat of a DNA sequence and a 16S rRNA gene probe, of F. necrophorum isolates of foot rot origin has been reported (15). However, in that study, F.