2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-004-0715-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restrictions on collapsing with a lower sectional curvature bound

Abstract: We obtain new topological information about the local structure of collapsing under a lower sectional curvature bound. As an application we prove a new sphere theorem and obtain a partial result towards the conjecture that not every Alexandrov space can be obtained as a limit of a sequence of Riemannian manifolds with sectional curvature bounded from below.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for some ε < r. In other words, we shall show that B M 3 α (x α , ε) looks like a fat solid torus with a shrinking core, i.e., In fact, using the conic lemma (Theorem 0.6 above), Kapovitch [22] already established a circle-fibration structure over the annular region A X 2 (x ∞ , δ, ε). Let x (X) denote the space of unit directions of an Alexandrov space X of curvature ≥ −1 at point x.…”
Section: Brief Introduction To Perelman's Mcs Theory and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…for some ε < r. In other words, we shall show that B M 3 α (x α , ε) looks like a fat solid torus with a shrinking core, i.e., In fact, using the conic lemma (Theorem 0.6 above), Kapovitch [22] already established a circle-fibration structure over the annular region A X 2 (x ∞ , δ, ε). Let x (X) denote the space of unit directions of an Alexandrov space X of curvature ≥ −1 at point x.…”
Section: Brief Introduction To Perelman's Mcs Theory and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the above argument, we employ the distance function from S( p, R) to prove Theorem 1.2. Similarly, one can use the averaged distance function constructed in [Perelman 1993] and [Kapovitch 2005] to prove Theorem 1.2.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the tangent cone at p splits: 20 Since gradient curves preserve extremal subsets q ∈ ∂A (see property 3.1.1 on page 18). Clearly |pq| = O(τ ), therefore applying the comparison from section 3.2 (or Corollary 3.1.3 if κ = 0 ) together with ( * ), we get…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%