2017
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtw042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restructuring in dynamic environments: a dynamic capabilities perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
1
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There is abundant literature that has supported that the turbulence and uncertainty environment affects firm performance (Barbero, Ramos, & Chiang, 2017;Chaudhary & Batra, 2018;Schilke, 2014;Wang & Li, 2008;Wilden & Gudergan, 2015). In line with previous studies that have demonstrated that environmental factors influence the relationship between innovation and operational capabilities on corporate performance (Aslam et al, 2018;Lu & Ramamurthy, 2011;Mikalef & Pateli, 2017).…”
Section: The Moderation Effects Of Environmental Dynamismsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…There is abundant literature that has supported that the turbulence and uncertainty environment affects firm performance (Barbero, Ramos, & Chiang, 2017;Chaudhary & Batra, 2018;Schilke, 2014;Wang & Li, 2008;Wilden & Gudergan, 2015). In line with previous studies that have demonstrated that environmental factors influence the relationship between innovation and operational capabilities on corporate performance (Aslam et al, 2018;Lu & Ramamurthy, 2011;Mikalef & Pateli, 2017).…”
Section: The Moderation Effects Of Environmental Dynamismsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Specifically, our results were more significant and showed a stronger effect for asset retrenchment (volume, β = −1.12, p < .00; timing, β = −1.00, p < .00; speed, β = −1.00, p < .00; interaction by timing, β = −0.89, p < .00; interaction by speed, β = −1.03, p < .00) than for cost retrenchment (volume, β = −1.00, p < .00; timing, β = −0.87, p < .01; speed, β = −0.57, p < .05; interaction by timing, β = −0.56, p < .05; interaction by speed, β = −0.25, p > .05). Asset retrenchment has been argued to be more strategic than cost retrenchment (Barbero, Ramos, et al, 2017; Morrow, Sirmon, Hitt, & Holcomb, 2007); thus the lever on profitability should be greater than cost retrenchment. Third, the early literature often included a third dimension of aggressiveness: aggressiveness complexity (Ferrier, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under an asset retrenchment strategy, firms deliberately eliminate assets by divesting equity, closing plants, and reducing the stock of property, equipment, and inventory (Lim et al, 2013; Morrow et al, 2004; Robbins & Pearce, 1992). The execution of asset retrenchment requires the transfer of the assets retrenched: Having a transactional bilateral nature, the declining firm needs to find an acquirer and is hence involved in a time- and resource-consuming process (Barbero, Ramos, & Chiang, 2017; Brauer, 2006; D. Lee & Madhavan, 2010).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Schilke (2014), dynamic resources may be able to generate a competitive advantage for the organization, according to the current level of environmental dynamism. Thus, environmental dynamism can increase the development, the importance, and use of dynamic capabilities, encouraging the use of dynamic resources in these contexts (Barbero & Ramos;Chiang, 2017;Frank, Güttel & Kessler, 2017).…”
Section: Relationship Between Hypotheses and Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Wang (2016), when family businesses are inserted in turbulent environments, there will be a need for them to develop the capability to interpret the environment to follow the changes. Dynamic environments increase the need to change the companies, mobilizing them to use their dynamic resources and to affect the need for change (Barbero et al, 2017).…”
Section: Analysis Of Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%