Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The introduction of non‐native tree species has become a global concern and may disrupt native communities and related ecosystem functions. Soil food webs regulate organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling in forests with their feeding activities, but evaluating consequences of the introduction of tree species on soil invertebrates is challenging due to the complex trophic structure and wide range in body size of soil invertebrates. Here, we employed an energetic food web approach and estimated the energy flux in soil food webs using a four‐node model including soil meso‐ and macrofauna decomposers and predators. We examined pure and mixed stands of native European beech (Fagus sylvatica), introduced Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and native range‐expanding Norway spruce (Picea abies) across site conditions. Compared to native forests, introduced tree species reduced total fresh mass of macrofauna predators by 92% at sandy sites but not that of decomposers, suggesting trophic downgrading in soil food webs by Douglas fir. The energy flux in mixed forests was intermediate between respective monocultures, suggesting that tree mixtures mitigate potential negative impacts of introduced tree species on food web functioning. Across size classes, soil macrofauna responded more sensitively to changes in environmental conditions than soil mesofauna. Additionally, total energy flux positively correlated with species richness, pointing to the significance of soil biodiversity for trophic functionality. The energy flux through mesofauna outweighed that through macrofauna when considering energy loss to predators, highlighting the importance of mesofauna for decomposition processes in forest soil food webs. Overall, the study emphasizes the critical role of tree species composition, site conditions and soil biodiversity in driving energy flux through soil food webs and maintaining forest ecosystem functions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
The introduction of non‐native tree species has become a global concern and may disrupt native communities and related ecosystem functions. Soil food webs regulate organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling in forests with their feeding activities, but evaluating consequences of the introduction of tree species on soil invertebrates is challenging due to the complex trophic structure and wide range in body size of soil invertebrates. Here, we employed an energetic food web approach and estimated the energy flux in soil food webs using a four‐node model including soil meso‐ and macrofauna decomposers and predators. We examined pure and mixed stands of native European beech (Fagus sylvatica), introduced Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and native range‐expanding Norway spruce (Picea abies) across site conditions. Compared to native forests, introduced tree species reduced total fresh mass of macrofauna predators by 92% at sandy sites but not that of decomposers, suggesting trophic downgrading in soil food webs by Douglas fir. The energy flux in mixed forests was intermediate between respective monocultures, suggesting that tree mixtures mitigate potential negative impacts of introduced tree species on food web functioning. Across size classes, soil macrofauna responded more sensitively to changes in environmental conditions than soil mesofauna. Additionally, total energy flux positively correlated with species richness, pointing to the significance of soil biodiversity for trophic functionality. The energy flux through mesofauna outweighed that through macrofauna when considering energy loss to predators, highlighting the importance of mesofauna for decomposition processes in forest soil food webs. Overall, the study emphasizes the critical role of tree species composition, site conditions and soil biodiversity in driving energy flux through soil food webs and maintaining forest ecosystem functions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Peatlands are important ecosystems for carbon storage worldwide and often contain unique species. Oribatid mites are the dominant soil arthropods in terrestrial systems like peatlands, where they show high diversity, yet are under-sampled. To create a checklist of oribatid mite species from peatlands in the U.S., we collected a total of 53 peat-soil samples between 2015 and 2020 from a peatland located at the Marcell Experimental Forest in Minnesota, U.S. that yielded an assemblage of 27 families, 43 genera and 49 species; species richness estimates range between 56–102 species. We compiled a final checklist with data from previous studies of American peatlands available online up until July 2024 that revealed an additional 107 species for a total of 156 species distributed in 83 genera and 27 families known from peatlands in the U.S. From our samples, Punctoribates palustris is present in the most states (N=6), and is known to be associated with Sphagnum mosses in North America. Other common peatland species such as Eniochthonius mahunkai, Mainothrus badius and Limnozetes lustrum were also abundant at our site. However, we also found species typical of drier environments (e.g., dry forests, dry montane regions, canopy habitats) such as Eueremaeus nr. proximus, Scapheremaeus palustris, and Cepheus corae. Thus, our results reinforce the idea that peatlands may have a specific subset of species that are common to these ecosystems, but that in general many different species can be occasionally found in peatlands.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.