2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-0255(02)00261-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restructuring the concurrent B+-tree with non-blocked search operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scheme guarantees that storage utilization is at least 66%. Among the other studies of concurrency and recovery issues, in-depth studies have been performed [17,[23][24][25]. Keller and Wiederhold [17] suggested a B-Tree variant that can ensure more concurrency with variable length data, and later, Lomet and Salzberg [24] extended their research to more generalized one.…”
Section: B-tree Indexes On Flash Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This scheme guarantees that storage utilization is at least 66%. Among the other studies of concurrency and recovery issues, in-depth studies have been performed [17,[23][24][25]. Keller and Wiederhold [17] suggested a B-Tree variant that can ensure more concurrency with variable length data, and later, Lomet and Salzberg [24] extended their research to more generalized one.…”
Section: B-tree Indexes On Flash Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manolopoulos [25] proposed a B-Tree variant to simultaneously enhance its capability of concurrency and recovery. Lim and Kim [23] proposed a recent B-Tree variant for enhancing concurrency. In their research, they proposed a way to prevent any locks on the search path by backing up the previous consistent sate of the B-Tree.…”
Section: B-tree Indexes On Flash Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%