2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1278-3218(00)00022-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Résultats d’un essai prospectif randomisé comparant une radiothérapie abdominopelvienne postopératoire et une chimiothérapie postopératoire dans les cancers de l’ovaire précoces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Followed up for 3 years Hreshchyshyn 1980 This trial compared chemotherapy against radiotherapy and no further treatment. The method of randomisation was not specified and a prognostic balance was not achieved in the different arms of the trial Klaassen 1988 This trial compared 3 different adjuvant treatments all given after pelvic radiotherapy: melphalan, whole abdominal radiotherapy and intraperitoneal radio-isotope therapy Kojs 2001 This trial compared adjuvant whole abdominal radiotherapy with CAP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and cisplatin) Maggioni 2006 This was a trial comparing systematic lymphadenectomy with lymph node sampling in apparent early stage ovarian cancer; it was not a trial of adjuvant treatment Mannel 2011 A randomised trial of maintenance low-dose paclitaxel for 24 weeks versus observation, in completely resected early-stage ovarian cancer patients receiving 3 cycles of chemotherapy (CP). Trial also known as GOG 175 Sell 1990 In this trial whole abdominal radiotherapy was compared to a combination of pelvic radiotherapy and cyclophosphamide.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studies [Ordered By Study Id]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Followed up for 3 years Hreshchyshyn 1980 This trial compared chemotherapy against radiotherapy and no further treatment. The method of randomisation was not specified and a prognostic balance was not achieved in the different arms of the trial Klaassen 1988 This trial compared 3 different adjuvant treatments all given after pelvic radiotherapy: melphalan, whole abdominal radiotherapy and intraperitoneal radio-isotope therapy Kojs 2001 This trial compared adjuvant whole abdominal radiotherapy with CAP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and cisplatin) Maggioni 2006 This was a trial comparing systematic lymphadenectomy with lymph node sampling in apparent early stage ovarian cancer; it was not a trial of adjuvant treatment Mannel 2011 A randomised trial of maintenance low-dose paclitaxel for 24 weeks versus observation, in completely resected early-stage ovarian cancer patients receiving 3 cycles of chemotherapy (CP). Trial also known as GOG 175 Sell 1990 In this trial whole abdominal radiotherapy was compared to a combination of pelvic radiotherapy and cyclophosphamide.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studies [Ordered By Study Id]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bowel obstruction was frequent in patients treated with 32 P (9%) and WAI (21%) when compared with to cisplatin arm (2%) (32). Because no survival benefit was shown with RT, cisplatin was recommended as the standard treatment for this subset of patients (Table 2) (33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Adjuvant Waimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prospective trials conducted in the 1970s showed promising results of postoperative radiation following surgery (Table 1 ) ( 25 , 29 – 35 ). Although patients with bulky disease following surgery were rarely cured, those patients with microscopic residual disease after initial cytoreductive surgery experienced disease-free survivals of 42–62% at 10 years in two randomized trials ( 29 , 30 ).…”
Section: Whole-abdomen Radiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%