2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from a novel modification to the ligation intersphincteric fistula tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One only compared LIFT with a modification of LIFT, rather than a standard treatment, whilst the other two compared LIFT with a mucosal advancement flap. In addition, 18 case series have been reviewed [187,[190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203][204][205][206] (Table 3). A number of series reporting fewer than 10 patients were disregarded for the purposes of this position statement.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One only compared LIFT with a modification of LIFT, rather than a standard treatment, whilst the other two compared LIFT with a mucosal advancement flap. In addition, 18 case series have been reviewed [187,[190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203][204][205][206] (Table 3). A number of series reporting fewer than 10 patients were disregarded for the purposes of this position statement.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modified LIFT was performed on a series 56 patients, with an overall cure rate of 71%. True recurrence (5%) was much less frequent than simple failure of the technique and persistence of an active fistula track after the operation [202]. LIFT has been used as treatment for recurrent fistulas [191].…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is no comparison between technical variations of LIFT, determining which variation is superior to others is difficult. Bastawrous et al [21] performed a modified LIFT in which they ligated the fistula tract from the external sphincter level and performed fistulotomy through the internal sphincter. Unlike traditional LIFT surgery, the success rate with this method, where they removed some of the internal sphincters, was 71.42%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bastawrous A et al 1 improved LIFT surgery to prevent infection of sphincter incision and fistula formation between sphincters. In their surgery, fistula tract was ligated at external sphincter, and internal sphincterotomy was performed along fistula tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%