2016
DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2016.1227333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from a pragmatic prospective cohort study: Shared decision making improves outcomes for children with asthma

Abstract: The evidence-based SDM intervention implemented in this study was associated with improved asthma outcomes for pediatric patients but not adult patients in a real world clinical setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elwyn et al described a practical 3‐step model for shared decision‐making: create awareness that a choice exists (i.e., choice talk), provide decision support through discussion of options, including pros and cons (i.e., option talk), and discuss patient values and/or preferences and arrive at a shared decision (i.e., decision talk). Shared decision‐making improves patient‐physician communication, increases patient satisfaction, and enables patients to feel more empowered to make difficult decisions, which can result in more favorable health outcomes . Still, patient preferences for participating in decision‐making vary, with some preferring to defer all responsibility to their physician and others viewing themselves as the primary decision makers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elwyn et al described a practical 3‐step model for shared decision‐making: create awareness that a choice exists (i.e., choice talk), provide decision support through discussion of options, including pros and cons (i.e., option talk), and discuss patient values and/or preferences and arrive at a shared decision (i.e., decision talk). Shared decision‐making improves patient‐physician communication, increases patient satisfaction, and enables patients to feel more empowered to make difficult decisions, which can result in more favorable health outcomes . Still, patient preferences for participating in decision‐making vary, with some preferring to defer all responsibility to their physician and others viewing themselves as the primary decision makers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From earlier work, we demonstrated that a facilitated approach to implementation of SDM was associated with improved perceptions of SDM and improved ED utilization for pediatric patients [17,18,[27][28][29]. Identified implementation barriers included time constraints of the clinical team in a volume-based reimbursement structure, staff turnover, and lack of availability of staff to train as health coaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Shared decision making (SDM) is an approach where patients and providers come together to determine the best plan of care based on evidence and patient preferences [17]. Previous studies show that SDM in primary care is associated with improved outcomes for pediatric patients with asthma [12,[17][18][19][20]. Implementation and dissemination have been highlighted as a key national priority by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ambulatory setting, newer approaches to treatment, such as shared decision making (SDM), have shown improved outcomes for patients with asthma [5,6]. However, the dissemination of such complex interventions has been slow or inconsistent [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An asthma action plan is prepared that incorporates the jointly agreed-upon treatment decisions. Improved outcomes for children with asthma were seen at six practices that previously adopted the SDM toolkit intervention using this facilitator-led approach [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%