Through the analysis of textual resources in reference to roundabout design, researchers explored possible differences in context presented in academic and practice-based resources through comparison of use and representation of engineering concepts. Researchers completed a content analysis of academic resources (i.e. textbooks) and field-collected, workplace resources (i.e. state and federal design guidelines and standards). Using engineering concepts (i.e. "sight distance," "superelevation," etc.) as units of analysis, researchers compared these two forms of material resources according to the prevalence of engineering concepts utilized, types of inscriptions utilized in concert with the concepts, structural differences in the layout of the resources, and differences in meaning associated with word usage in the two different forms of texts. Initial findings indicate suggestive (but inconclusive evidence) of a difference in use of visual representations in the texts. In regards to use and representation of engineering concepts, concepts descriptive of geometric elements of roundabouts were equally prevalent in both types of resources. Overall, there existed suggestive, but inconclusive evidence, in a difference in density of use of words relating to transportation engineering concepts between the two types of textual resources. The most interesting outcome of the analysis of data is the apparent different functions of auxiliary verbs between the sources in communicating information regarding design of roundabouts. This research explores textual resources from a situated learning lens allowing identification of concepts that are relevant to engineers as they design a specific transportation facility. It also initiates the identification of contexts relevant to the day-to-day work of practicing engineers. Students are viewed as "newcomers" as they transition from academia to industry and are poised to learn and be mentored by "old timers" through firsthand and secondhand experiences. As such, newcomers tend to learn via the perspective of their mentors, and-as cited by studies of newcomers to industry -they may not utilize their academic resources in the same way or even at all as they make their transitions to the workplace. By comparing the types of resources relevant to newcomers' experiences, and in particular, differences in the ways concepts are presented and the discourse emergent within the text, the gap between academia and practice may be better bridged.