1992
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(92)90585-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from E735 at the tevatron proton-antiproton collider with √s = 1.8 TeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values obtained from Eq. (2) for the AA mean multiplicity are based on: nonsingle diffractivepp collisions at FNAL by the E735 experiment [7,24], at CERN by the UA5 experiment at √ spp = 546 GeV [25] and √ spp = 200 and 900 GeV [26]; pp collisions from CERN-ISR [27], and from the inelastic data from the bubble chamber experiments [28][29][30], the latter having been compiled and analyzed in [31]. The LHC multiplicities in pp interactions are calculated using the hybrid fit obtained here, Eq.…”
Section: The Participant Dissipating Energy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values obtained from Eq. (2) for the AA mean multiplicity are based on: nonsingle diffractivepp collisions at FNAL by the E735 experiment [7,24], at CERN by the UA5 experiment at √ spp = 546 GeV [25] and √ spp = 200 and 900 GeV [26]; pp collisions from CERN-ISR [27], and from the inelastic data from the bubble chamber experiments [28][29][30], the latter having been compiled and analyzed in [31]. The LHC multiplicities in pp interactions are calculated using the hybrid fit obtained here, Eq.…”
Section: The Participant Dissipating Energy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…energy dependence of the charged particle mean multiplicity in pp/pp collisions. The measurements are taken from: nonsingle diffractivepp collisions at FNAL by the E735 experiment[7,24], at CERN by the UA5 experiment at √ spp = 546 GeV[25] and √ spp = 200 and 900 GeV[26]; pp collisions from CERN-ISR[27], and from the inelastic data from the bubble chamber experiments[28][29][30][31]44].The solid line shows the hybrid fit, 1.60−0.03 ln(spp)+0.18 ln 2 (spp)+0.03 s 0.29 pp , the dotted line shows the power-law fit, −7.36+6.97 s 0.133 pp , and the dashed line shows the second-order log fit, 3.18−0.57 ln(spp)+0.216 ln 2 (spp). The open stars show the predictions by the PDE approach with the error bars of 5% uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) for the AA mean multiplicity based on:pp collisions at FNAL by E735 Collab. [56,57], at CERN by UA5 Collab. at √ spp = 546 GeV [45] and √ spp = 200 and 900 GeV [58]; pp collisions at CERN-ISR [46], and the ALICE, CMS and CDF multiplicities, calculated using the E735 fit, 3.102 s 0.178 pp [57], and the data from bubble chamber experiments [50,59] the latter having been compiled and analysed in [60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here q is the probability of finding a central event in which plasma is formed, P had n is the multiplicity distribution for purely hadronic events with mean N had , and P qg n is the multiplicity distribution for events in which a plasma was formed with mean N qg . Experimentally one would expect to see a bump in P n at larger values of n. A structure like that was found in charged particle multiplicity distributions in pp collisions at the CERN [14,15] and Fermilab [16,17] colliders. For energies larger then 540 GeV a shoulder develops in the multiplicity distribution, becoming more pronounced as the beam energy increases.…”
Section: Consequences For the Multiplicity Distributionmentioning
confidence: 69%