2000
DOI: 10.1136/jms.7.4.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from the UK NHS breast screening programme 1994–1999

Abstract: Objective-To present results from the NHS breast screening programme (NHS-BSP) from 1994 through to 1999 and to examine the extent to which interim targets are being achieved. Methods-Data were collated from all screening programmes in the UK on standard statistical returns. Performance of the screening programme was evaluated using calculated targets based on comparison with the Swedish two counties (STC) randomised controlled trial. Results-In the early years of screening (1988-1993), the NHS programme was d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other countries have observed increasing incidence of DCIS, sometimes three-to four-fold, with increasing mammographic screening (Ernster et al, 1996;Levi et al, 1997;Zheng et al, 1997;Barchielli et al, 1999;Blanks et al, 2000). This increase has stopped in NSW and we would expect further increases only with growth in BreastScreen participation beyond 53 -54% in 199853 -54% in -200053 -54% in (Estoesta et al, 2000Productivity Commission, 2002) or resurgence in mammographic screening reimbursed by Medicare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Other countries have observed increasing incidence of DCIS, sometimes three-to four-fold, with increasing mammographic screening (Ernster et al, 1996;Levi et al, 1997;Zheng et al, 1997;Barchielli et al, 1999;Blanks et al, 2000). This increase has stopped in NSW and we would expect further increases only with growth in BreastScreen participation beyond 53 -54% in 199853 -54% in -200053 -54% in (Estoesta et al, 2000Productivity Commission, 2002) or resurgence in mammographic screening reimbursed by Medicare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Approximately 20% of the breast cancers detected in the NHSBSP are in situ cancers (9). Detection of in situ disease should result in a decrease in the incidence of invasive disease; however, this effect is likely to be small and difficult to observe in population trends (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NHSBSP largely relies on such measures to monitor performance, both of the program as a whole and of individual screening units (9). Trends in incidence rates will also be affected by other factors besides screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the first report of long-term outcomes from breast cancer in women invited for NHS screening and shows a significant difference in the rate of advanced disease between two programmes with different cancer detection and attendance rates. Cancer detection rates have improved throughout the NHS breastscreening programme and now commonly exceed those seen in Wigan during this study, but routinely collected statistics do not allow us to assess whether the high proportion of regular attenders observed in Wigan has been replicated elsewhere within the programme (Blanks et al, 2000b). If this proportion varies between individual programmes, then comparisons between programmes with different proportions of regular attenders may provide a means for evaluating the impact of NHS breast screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%