Results of 20 years of experimental forest management on breeding birds in Ozark forests of Missouri, USA

Morris, Dana L.; Porneluzi, Paul A.; Haslerig, Janet M.; Clawson, Richard L.; Faaborg, John

doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.020

Cited by 38 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…2) analysis of bird responses to habitat changes during economic activity (Rudnicky, Hunter, 1993;Gram et al, 2003;Yahner, 2003;Alterman et al, 2005;Wallendorf et al, 2007;Morris et al, 2013;Williams et al, 2013;Porneluzi et al, 2014).…”

Section: Methodical Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Буферные зоны имеют два уровня, для каждого из которых назначе-ны ограничения. Буферная зона -«абсо-лютная зона» -радиусом 200 м от гнезда запрещает любую лесохозяйственную дея-тельность в течение всего года; зона в 201-800 м от гнезда запрещает строительство и сплошные рубки в любое время года, но разрешает выборочные рубки и лесопосад-ки вне сезона размножения -с 15 апреля по 1 сентября (Naylor, Watt, 2004;OMNR, 2010). Рекомендации по буферным зонам для скопы, используемые в настоящее вре-мя в лесах на территории Великих озёр и реки Святого Лаврентия, предусматрива-ют двухуровневые буферные зоны вокруг всех гнёзд скопы, которые были заняты в…”

Section: Fig 9 Flight Initiation Distances (Fid) For the Osprey (Paunclassified

“…Karyakin. Raptors Conservation 2017, 35 течение последних 5 лет: в 150-метровой зоне запрещается любая лесохозяйствен-ная деятельность в течение всего года; в зоне, радиусом от 151 до 300 м от гнезда, запрещены рубки в период размножения (с 1 марта по 31 июля), а вне сезона раз-множения имеют некоторые ограничения (Naylor, 1994;OMNR, 2010). Стоит отме-тить, что проведённая в 2001 г. проверка 150 скопиных гнёзд в районе Великих Озёр не выявили негативного влияния рубок, ве-дущихся за пределами установленных бу-ферных зон, на занятость или продуктив-ность гнёзд скопы (Naylor et al, 2003).…”

Section: Nest Of the Osprey On The Dry Pine Tree On The Shore Of The unclassified

“…Чтобы увеличить вероятность повторного использования гнёзд ястребами, авторы рекомендовали сохранять участки старо-го леса вокруг гнёзд на площади не менее 2 га, что в 2,5 раза больше утверждён-ных параметров. Тяготение тетеревятника к гнездованию в более старых участках леса, особенно темнохвойного, либо сме-шанного леса с более старыми темнох-войными деревьями, отмечена в разных странах Европы (Selas, 1997;Penteriani, 2002;Finn et al, 2002;Lohmus, 2005;Squires, Kennedy, 2006;Tornberg et al, 2006;Selas et al, 2008;Björklund et al, 2015) и в Японии, где ястребы предпочи-тали устраивать гнёзда на японском кедре (Cryptomeria japonica) диаметром более 50 см на уровне груди (Natsukawa et al, 2017). В другом исследовании в Северной …”

Section: Fig 18 Flight Initiation Distances (Fid) For the Goshawk (unclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Size of Specially Protected Forest Sites for Raptors: What Size of These Sites Should be for Protect the Raptor’s Breeding Territories?

Karyakin¹,

Nikolenko²,

Bakka³

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodical Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Fig 9 Flight Initiation Distances (Fid) For the Osprey (Paunclassified

Section: Nest Of the Osprey On The Dry Pine Tree On The Shore Of The unclassified

Section: Fig 18 Flight Initiation Distances (Fid) For the Goshawk (unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Size of Specially Protected Forest Sites for Raptors: What Size of These Sites Should be for Protect the Raptor’s Breeding Territories?

Karyakin¹,

Nikolenko²,

Bakka³

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Natural resource extraction and wildlife conservation are two uses that are frequently pitted against each other during inter-user discussions over forest management plans [2][3][4]. Clearcuts are an effective timber harvest technique for diversifying the age structure of trees within forests and for creating habitat for wildlife species that specialize in young forest habitats, but there is evidence that clearcuts negatively impact most amphibian species (e.g., [5][6][7]). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Buffer-Mediated Effects of Clearcutting on In-Pool Amphibian Productivity: Can Aquatic Processes Compensate for Terrestrial Habitat Disturbance?

Powell

Babbitt

2016

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Natural resource extraction and wildlife conservation are often perceived as incompatible. For wetland-dependent amphibians, forested buffers may mitigate timber-harvest impacts, but little empirical research has focused on buffers around lentic habitats. We conducted a landscape experiment to examine how spotted salamander and wood frog reproductive output (i.e., eggmass and metamorph production) respond to clearcutting mediated by buffers of different widths (i.e., uncut, 30 m buffer, 100 m buffer) at ephemeral pools in an industrial forest. We found complex interactions between buffer treatment and reproductive output, which were strongly mediated by hydroperiod. Overall, reproductive output was most sensitive at 30 m-buffer pools and for salamanders, but responses diverged across productivity metrics even within these categories. Notably, for both cut treatments over time, while salamander eggmass abundance decreased, metamorph productivity (i.e., snout-vent length [SVL] and abundance) tended to increase. For example, average metamorph SVLs were predicted to lengthen between 0.2 and 0.4 mm per year post-cut. Additionally, typical relationships between reproductive output and hydroperiod (as indicated by the reference treatment) were disrupted for both species in both cut treatments. For example, long-hydroperiod pools produced more salamander metamorphs than short-hydroperiod pools in both the reference and 30 m-buffer treatments, but the rate of increase was lower in the 30 m-buffer treatment such that a long-hydroperiod pool in the reference treatment was predicted to produce, on average, 24 more metamorphs than a similar pool in the 30 m-buffer treatment. From a conservation perspective, our results highlight the importance of evaluating both terrestrial and aquatic responses to terrestrial habitat disturbance, since responses may be reinforcing (i.e., exert similarly positive or negative effects, with the potential for amplification in the aquatic habitat) or decoupled (i.e., operate independently or be negatively correlated, with responses in the aquatic habitat potentially dampening or counteracting responses in the terrestrial habitat).

show abstract

Functional diversity response to hardwood forest management varies across taxa and spatial scales

Murray

Holland

Summerville

et al. 2017

Ecological Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contemporary forest management offers a trade-off between the potential positive effects of habitat heterogeneity on biodiversity, and the potential harm to mature forest communities caused by habitat loss and perforation of the forest canopy. While the response of taxonomic diversity to forest management has received a great deal of scrutiny, the response of functional diversity is largely unexplored. However, functional diversity may represent a more direct link between biodiversity and ecosystem function. To examine how forest management affects diversity at multiple spatial scales, we analyzed a long-term data set that captured changes in taxonomic and functional diversity of moths (Lepidoptera), longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), and breeding birds in response to contemporary silvicultural systems in oak-hickory hardwood forests. We used these data sets to address the following questions: how do even- and uneven-aged silvicultural systems affect taxonomic and functional diversity at the scale of managed landscapes compared to the individual harvested and unharvested forest patches that comprise the landscapes, and how do these silvicultural systems affect the functional similarity of assemblages at the scale of managed landscapes and patches? Due to increased heterogeneity within landscapes, we expected even-aged silviculture to increase and uneven-aged silviculture to decrease functional diversity at the landscape level regardless of impacts at the patch level. Functional diversity responses were taxon-specific with respect to the direction of change and time since harvest. Responses were also consistent across patch and landscape levels within each taxon. Moth assemblage species richness, functional richness, and functional divergence were negatively affected by harvesting, with stronger effects resulting from uneven-aged than even-aged management. Longhorned beetle assemblages exhibited a peak in species richness two years after harvesting, while functional diversity metrics did not differ between harvested and unharvested patches and managed landscapes. The species and functional richness of breeding bird assemblages increased in response to harvesting with more persistent effects in uneven- than in even-aged managed landscapes. For moth and bird assemblages, species turnover was driven by species with more extreme trait combinations. Our study highlights the variability of multi-taxon functional diversity in response to forest management across multiple spatial scales.

show abstract

Results of 20 years of experimental forest management on breeding birds in Ozark forests of Missouri, USA

Cited by 38 publications

References 71 publications

Size of Specially Protected Forest Sites for Raptors: What Size of These Sites Should be for Protect the Raptor’s Breeding Territories?

Size of Specially Protected Forest Sites for Raptors: What Size of These Sites Should be for Protect the Raptor’s Breeding Territories?

Buffer-Mediated Effects of Clearcutting on In-Pool Amphibian Productivity: Can Aquatic Processes Compensate for Terrestrial Habitat Disturbance?

Functional diversity response to hardwood forest management varies across taxa and spatial scales

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About