2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a community vision-screening program using the Spot photoscreener

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photoscreening has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity in community and office settings. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Photoscreening instruments assess both eyes simultaneously and the images can be interpreted by trained operators, by a central reading center, or with computer software.…”
Section: Instrument-based Screening Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photoscreening has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity in community and office settings. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Photoscreening instruments assess both eyes simultaneously and the images can be interpreted by trained operators, by a central reading center, or with computer software.…”
Section: Instrument-based Screening Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Although the Spot Vision Screener 3 (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY) is marketed to schools, 4,5 there are few published reports evaluating its effectiveness. 6-8 Silbert and Matta 9 recently reported their experience using the Spot with the original software (v. 1.0.3), noting that performance would be expected to improve with future criteria modifications and improved software. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the newer software versions of the Spot (v. 1.1.51 and v. 2.0.16) in detecting amblyopia risk factors according to the 2013 American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Vision Screening Committee guidelines for automated vision screeners.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our referral rate (27%) is both greater and less than that found in other reported programs. 3,11,12 Because automated screeners detect risk factors for amblyopia even prior to the development of pathology, this rate of referral is not unexpected. 13 Adjustments in the referral criteria in this age group have been recommended in an effort to lower referral rates and improve the PPV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%