2011
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3181edb88f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a Computed Tomography Protocol Evaluating Distal Third Tibial Shaft Fractures to Assess Noncontiguous Malleolar Fractures

Abstract: Plain radiographs are often insufficient for detecting posterior malleolus fractures in conjunction with ipsilateral distal third diaphyseal tibia fractures. Using a preoperative CT protocol for tibial shaft fractures can significantly improve the ability to diagnose associated intra-articular fractures that may not be evident on plain radiographs. Knowledge of these associated intra-articular fractures may prompt fracture stabilization and can prevent displacement during intramedullary nailing of tibia shaft … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe the reason to be the different characteristics of our study cohort compared to those of previous studies that included direct and crush injuries. [7][8][9] Our study essentially investigated the tibial shaft fractures caused by indirect injury. In this study, we defined ankle injuries as involving the lateral malleolar fracture and distal tibial articular surface and systematically categorized ankle injuries into posterior malleolar and AITFL avulsion fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe the reason to be the different characteristics of our study cohort compared to those of previous studies that included direct and crush injuries. [7][8][9] Our study essentially investigated the tibial shaft fractures caused by indirect injury. In this study, we defined ankle injuries as involving the lateral malleolar fracture and distal tibial articular surface and systematically categorized ankle injuries into posterior malleolar and AITFL avulsion fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent studies utilizing CT imaging to evaluate for concomitant ankle fractures demonstrated a higher incidence of injury ranging from 39–43%. 8,10 However, both of these studies limited their investigation to distal one-third diaphyseal tibia fractures. Our results indicate that concomitant articular ankle injuries are more common than previously reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, although distal one-third spiral tibial shaft fractures have been shown to have a strong association with concomitant ankle fractures, no publication has explicitly quantified the predictive ability of this, or other, radiographic fracture patterns. 810 Therefore, our hypothesis for this study is twofold: 1) the incidence of concomitant ankle injuries and tibial shaft fractures is underappreciated and is higher than previously reported; and 2) common radiographic characteristics such as location and pattern of the tibial and fibular shaft fractures exist that can quantitatively predict the presence or absence of an ankle injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dedicated imaging studies are required in order to appropriately diagnose the injury. Recently, routine CT scans have been recommended for distal third tibial shaft fractures due to the high co-incidence of associated ankle fractures [10]. Similarly, we suggest considering CT scans of the knee when there is a suspicion for a proximal tibiofibular dislocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%