Results of a Delphi survey in drawing up the input–output tables for Catalonia

Landeta, Jon; Matey, Jesus; Ruiz, Vicente Sotés; Galter, Jordi

doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.005

Cited by 32 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Delphi survey was limited to two rounds regardless of the degree of consensus achieved (measured by the coefficient of variation/standard deviation), a methodologically sound practice (Von der Gracht, 2012; Dayé, 2018). Between the rounds, we highlighted for each expert those answers which significantly differed from the central tendencies and asked regarding inconsistencies or substantial deviation from the group, using controlled feedback (Landeta et al, 2008;Skirton et al, 2013). The participants were offered the option to change their replies or add explanatory comments regarding their deviant positions.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since then, IVF has remarkably improved, providing solutions to an increasing number of pathologies of infertility. IVF is increasingly complemented through embryo selection by Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD), available since 1990, and particularly by Delphi is a widely used qualitative method for forecasting, assessment and decision making regarding complex problems, built on a panel of experts who contribute with their knowledge and experience (Landeta et al, 2008). It is conducted with controlled feedback following a two-rounds survey, which allows experts to change their replies or add comments after learning the general views (Landeta & Barrutia, 2011;Von der Gracht, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Contesting the Geneticization Thesis in Human Reproduction: Dealing with Spiral Shaped Processes and Technoscientific Imaginaries

Alón¹,

Guimón²,

Urbanos-Garrido³

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper questions the potential shift of reproduction towards assisted reproductive technologies due to benefits provided by genetic manipulation of embryos. In order to examine the viability of such a shift and its implications from a regulatory perspective, we relied on two panels of experts from Israel and Spain, using the Delphi method and a series of in-depth interviews. We anticipate, at a first stage, a continuous-steady growth in the use of IVF, supplemented by preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the introduction of CRISPR/Cas. At a second stage, attracting a growing share of fertile people would require developments in genomics. While it is unclear whether these developments will fully materialize, they could be replaced by technoscientific imaginaries generating perceived benefits. We conclude that the regulation of reproductive genetics is becoming more critical and complex. The aim should be to ensure good practices and equity, while providing more information to the public. A broad and inclusive societal debate may overcome the difficulty of drawing a clear line between medical uses and non-medical uses of genetic selection and engineering and may contribute to finding the right balance between allowing autonomous decisions of patients and protecting the public interest.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contesting the Geneticization Thesis in Human Reproduction: Dealing with Spiral Shaped Processes and Technoscientific Imaginaries

Alón¹,

Guimón²,

Urbanos-Garrido³

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Las puntuaciones de Pertinencia y Adecuación por ítem fueron analizadas mediante estadísticos de tendencia central, dispersión y posición para conocer el consenso entre los panelistas participantes [21]. Para otorgar rigurosidad a esta fase, se aceptaron aquellos ítems con valores >3,0 en la puntuación media, <1,5 en la desviación típica y >4,0 en la mediana.…”

Section: Fase Iii: Panel Delphi -Consenso Y Fiabilidadunclassified

Conjunto básico de ítems en bioseguridad para empresas ecuatorianas ante COVID-19

León

García

Espinoza-Samaniego

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCCIÓN. La aplicación de recomendaciones en salud pública por el SARS-CoV-2 son una prioridad para Ecuador. De forma particular, la implementación de medidas en bioseguridad para las empresas son una necesidad para la continuidad de su actividad. OBJETIVO. Diseñar y validar un Check-List de medidas en bioseguridad para la COVID-19 en los lugares de trabajo. METODOLOGÍA. Estudio de carácter cuali-cuantitativo desarrollado en fases participativas y trabajo de campo. Se determinó la razón de validez de contenido aplicando panel de expertos, método Delphi adaptado para el consenso y fiabilidad mediante cálculo de estadísticos y concordancia inter-observadores en dos empresas. RESULTADOS. El Check-List final quedó conformado por 12 dimensiones y 37 ítems, la fiabilidad de pertinencia (α=0,931) y adecuación (α=0,961) para el conjunto de ítems resultó unánime para la mayoría de los ítems. El índice de Kappa mostró valores moderados (K = 0,57) y casi perfectos (K = 0,85). CONCLUSIONES. El conjunto de ítems muestra criterios válidos y fiables que justifican su empleo para empresas del país.

show abstract

“…AgileDelphi method needs to repeat many times through the exchange of information and feedback correction, in order to get the gradual convergence of views of experts, which is considered as an expert group comprehensive view. Therefore, agile-Delphi method requires repeated investigations [32], each of its findings back to consultants are adjusted for their views. Consultants are concerned, so agile-Delphi method is a multi-round group decision- making process.…”

Section: Mathematical Model and Algorithm Of Group Decision-making Abmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the group decision-making about emergency event based on network technology

Xie

Gang

et al. 2011

Inf Technol Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to improve decision-making efficiency about emergency event, this paper proposes a novel concept, i.e., Agile-Delphi Method, which is an integration of agile decision and Delphi Method implicating that the decision-makers instantly deliver, respond, treat, and utilize information via Delphi process while conducting group decision-making about emergency event. The paper details the mechanism of group decision-making about emergency event based on network technology and Agile-Delphi Method. Finally, the paper conducts an empiric analysis taking the ''111 event'', i.e., the liquid ammonia spill event happened on November 1, 2006 in a phosphorus chemical company in China, as an example.

show abstract

Results of a Delphi survey in drawing up the input–output tables for Catalonia

Cited by 32 publications

References 23 publications

Contesting the Geneticization Thesis in Human Reproduction: Dealing with Spiral Shaped Processes and Technoscientific Imaginaries

Contesting the Geneticization Thesis in Human Reproduction: Dealing with Spiral Shaped Processes and Technoscientific Imaginaries

Conjunto básico de ítems en bioseguridad para empresas ecuatorianas ante COVID-19

Research on the group decision-making about emergency event based on network technology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About