1985
DOI: 10.2307/3586772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a National Survey of Graduates of Bilingual Education Programs

Abstract: A national sample of graduates of bilingual education programs at the doctoral, master's, and bachelor's levels was surveyed by mail and by telephone to determine what proportion of them had entered the field of bilingual education and to describe the jobs they held. Results of the survey, conducted under contract to the U.S. Department of Education, indicated that the vast majority of the graduates were applying their skills to the education of students with limited English proficiency. The majority of the gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the survey undertaken by Day (1984), this survey had a return rate of 46% (excluding the 36 questionnaires returned as undeliverable). Since the response rate did not reach the recommended rate of 60% (Fowler, 1983;McMillan & Shumacher, 1984) and since nonresponse can be a major source of error in survey research (Johnson, 1985), it must be emphasized that the results reported in this article do not apply to the entire TESL professional population. Moreover, since the survey was aimed at professionals in our field, the results primarily represent the views of researchers rather than those of ESL teachers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the survey undertaken by Day (1984), this survey had a return rate of 46% (excluding the 36 questionnaires returned as undeliverable). Since the response rate did not reach the recommended rate of 60% (Fowler, 1983;McMillan & Shumacher, 1984) and since nonresponse can be a major source of error in survey research (Johnson, 1985), it must be emphasized that the results reported in this article do not apply to the entire TESL professional population. Moreover, since the survey was aimed at professionals in our field, the results primarily represent the views of researchers rather than those of ESL teachers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%