1998
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of megestrol acetate modulation of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance in the first-line management of small-cell lung carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All adverse events were mild and transient. Although thromboembolic disease was reported in several studies [19,21,22], there were no thromboembolic diseases reported in this study because low-dose and short-term administration of megestrol acetate were used. The rate of side effects was similar in the two regimens, except for increased appetite, which appeared to be more pronounced in the megestrol acetate regimen, and this side effect has been widely recognized.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All adverse events were mild and transient. Although thromboembolic disease was reported in several studies [19,21,22], there were no thromboembolic diseases reported in this study because low-dose and short-term administration of megestrol acetate were used. The rate of side effects was similar in the two regimens, except for increased appetite, which appeared to be more pronounced in the megestrol acetate regimen, and this side effect has been widely recognized.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Those patients who received megestrol acetate had significantly less nausea (p= 0.0002) and vomiting (p=0.02). However, the rates of vomiting and nausea were not different between the MA arm and the placebo arm in another trial [19].Thus, megestrol acetate seemed to fare well even when compared to an accepted antiemetic drug. This is the first study to aim directly at the antiemetic efficacy of megestrol acetate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some studies have shown a relationship between expression of Pgp or MRP1 and response or survival [19][20][21][22][23], however, their clinical usefulness as therapeutic targets is still obscure. In fact, two randomized phase III studies that incorporated modulators of Pgp and one phase II study of VX-710, an inhibitor of both Pgp and MRP1, failed to show any survival benefit in SCLC patients [24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In cancer therapy, many attempts have been made to reverse MDR mechanisms. However, in a randomized double-blind trial in 130 SCLC patients no positive effects were seen with the P-gp modulator megestrol acetate in addition to chemotherapeutic drugs, suggesting that levels of P-gp expression in lung tumors were not relevant or that modulation of P-gp activity was not complete in this treatment 51 . Although immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine A and tacrolimus (both calcineurin antagonists) are P-gp substrates, no relation was found of MDR1 G2677T and C3435T genotypes with tacrolimus blood levels in 83 lung transplant patients treated with tacrolimus 52 .…”
Section: Mdr1 In Lung Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 95%