2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of an IAEA inter-comparison exercise to assess 137Cs and total 210Pb analytical performance in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The counting time for each sample was set at 80 000 s to reach an acceptable level of detection limit and to reach a measurement error under 10 % at 2σ precision. Calibration of equipment, analysis and quality control of the measurements were performed following IAEA standard procedure (Shakhashiro and Mabit, 2009).…”
Section: Cs Analysis and Estimation Of Soil Erosion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The counting time for each sample was set at 80 000 s to reach an acceptable level of detection limit and to reach a measurement error under 10 % at 2σ precision. Calibration of equipment, analysis and quality control of the measurements were performed following IAEA standard procedure (Shakhashiro and Mabit, 2009).…”
Section: Cs Analysis and Estimation Of Soil Erosion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These PTs evaluate the validity and reliability of the analytical results. Through the provision of reference materials, control and performance assessment by the organization of proficiency tests and inter-comparison exercises, IAEA has been assisting laboratories in testing, improving and maintaining the reliability and quality of analyses of radioactive material [2]. The data presented are the results submitted for the IAEA-TEL-2011-03 world-wide open proficiency test on spiked water and soil samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the frame of accreditation systems, the use of reference materials, both for quality control and proficiency testing, has therefore increased in recent years [1]. In addition, proficiency testing that includes distribution of homogenous portions of the test material for analysis as an unknown is a method for assessing and documenting the reliability and accuracy of the analytical data produced [2]. This paper presents the results obtained by the laboratory in an intercomparison exercise organized by IAEA in 2011, the first year when the laboratory has participated in such proficiency test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were digested based on USTUR sample preparation methodology. In order to assess the analytical performances of the methodology, two statistical parameters suggested by Shakhashiro and Mabit [19] were determined to evaluate laboratory performances and their scoring: relative bias and U test values.…”
Section: Analytical Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%