2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of an international comparison for the activity measurement of 177Lu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source was delivered in a 10 mL Schott-type dose vial and NIST performed measurements on multiple dose calibrators in both the dose vial and 5 mL ampoule geometries. The standard activity was taken from ICA using the K -value determined in 2009 by anticoincidence counting [32]. The uncertainty on the standard activity (0.37 %) was the largest component in the combined standard uncertainties on the determined DSs in all cases except for the CRC-35R calibrator where the uncertainty on the reading (estimated in this case from the range of minimum and maximum readings observed over a few seconds) was larger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source was delivered in a 10 mL Schott-type dose vial and NIST performed measurements on multiple dose calibrators in both the dose vial and 5 mL ampoule geometries. The standard activity was taken from ICA using the K -value determined in 2009 by anticoincidence counting [32]. The uncertainty on the standard activity (0.37 %) was the largest component in the combined standard uncertainties on the determined DSs in all cases except for the CRC-35R calibrator where the uncertainty on the reading (estimated in this case from the range of minimum and maximum readings observed over a few seconds) was larger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Zimmerman et al (15), the amount of 177m Lu was estimated to approximately 0.03% of the 177 Lu at a nominal reference time, thus giving an x value of 0.9997. In the present work, x was measured to 0.9997. x values of 0.9995 and 0.99975 were thus assumed in further analyses, representative of 1 worst case and 1 more likely scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the very first step, traceability of the activity meter used for measurement of 177 Lu is established by cross-calibration with a standard metrology laboratory (Zimmerman et al , 2012). In this example, a traceable secondary standard dose calibrator (Southern Scientific, Henfield, UK) is used, which comes with a traceability certificate issued by the National Physical Laboratory (Teddington, UK).…”
Section: A1 131i Nai Treatment Of Benign Thyroid Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%