2012
DOI: 10.1017/s1047951112000157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of balloon dilatation of stenotic homografts in pulmonary position in children and young adults

Abstract: Balloon dilatation is able to reduce the peak systolic pressure gradient over homografts in a subgroup of patients and can be of clinical significance to postpone re-intervention or pulmonary valve replacement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 4) 5) 17) 18) 19) Consistently, we found that balloon dilatation in pulmonary homografts provided better results than aortic or femoral vein homografts, although the reasons behind these differences are not entirely clear. Bertels et al 7) reported favorable effects after balloon dilatation of homografts, but could not identify any significant factors predictive of a favorable effect. Powell et al 10) proposed that absence of calcification and younger conduit age are factors associated with better results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“… 4) 5) 17) 18) 19) Consistently, we found that balloon dilatation in pulmonary homografts provided better results than aortic or femoral vein homografts, although the reasons behind these differences are not entirely clear. Bertels et al 7) reported favorable effects after balloon dilatation of homografts, but could not identify any significant factors predictive of a favorable effect. Powell et al 10) proposed that absence of calcification and younger conduit age are factors associated with better results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The group with favorable results after balloon dilatation had a longer interval from conduit insertion, although the difference was not significant (27.0 months vs. 22.3 months), which was similar to Bertels et al's findings. 7) We also did not evaluate calcification in our study, as this parameter is difficult to quantify.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations