2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of Compliant Participation in Five Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening for Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ours was a population-based study using cancer registry data for an entire region in Italy rather than from a single centre. We were also able to adjust for screening status in a region where a CRC screening programme has been active since 2005, with a 50% participation rate [ 31 ]. Screening has changed the epidemiological profile of colorectal cancer in Italy and has also had an impact on survival [ 2 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ours was a population-based study using cancer registry data for an entire region in Italy rather than from a single centre. We were also able to adjust for screening status in a region where a CRC screening programme has been active since 2005, with a 50% participation rate [ 31 ]. Screening has changed the epidemiological profile of colorectal cancer in Italy and has also had an impact on survival [ 2 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of the study is that it was not possible to analyze the sensitivity and specificity for both CRC detection and adenomas, as we cannot count the number of adenomas not detected by the FIT. Another limitation is that other variables that have been shown to be related to FIT performance, such as tobacco use or personal history of FIT screening tests in previous participations [19,28] are not included in the study.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to define which groups could be excluded from screening, we compared the cumulative CRC incidence and mortality observed for each study subgroup (according to sex and number of negative FITs, for example, “women with three negative FITs”) with different reference thresholds: The cumulative CRC risk recommended as the appropriate threshold (3% over 15 years) for offering screening in a recent guideline, based on modeling of the expected benefit‐to‐harm ratio 14 The 5‐year and 10‐year cumulative CRC incidence and mortality of a cohort of subjects aged 50 years (ie, the cohort with the lowest CRC incidence that is included in the screening program) and of a cohort of subjects aged 45 years (whose risk is deemed to be low enough to justify its exclusion from screening in Italy).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative CRC risk recommended as the appropriate threshold (3% over 15 years) for offering screening in a recent guideline, based on modeling of the expected benefit-to-harm ratio. 14 2. The 5-year and 10-year cumulative CRC incidence and mortality of a cohort of subjects aged 50 years (ie, the cohort with the lowest CRC incidence that is included in the screening program) and of a cohort of subjects aged 45 years (whose risk is deemed to be low enough to justify its exclusion from screening in Italy).…”
Section: What's New?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation