2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of Four-Corner Arthrodesis Using Dorsal Circular Plate Fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
107
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
11
107
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1999, a metallic circular plate was introduced to provide a simple and sturdy method of internal fixation that might tolerate earlier mobilization of the wrist while also resulting in higher rates of fusion. Early enthusiasm for the implant, however, was dampened by reports of high rates of complications [2,4,9,11]. The results of our study are more in line with the more recently published results of Merrell et al, with a 100% rate of union with low morbidity and good function [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1999, a metallic circular plate was introduced to provide a simple and sturdy method of internal fixation that might tolerate earlier mobilization of the wrist while also resulting in higher rates of fusion. Early enthusiasm for the implant, however, was dampened by reports of high rates of complications [2,4,9,11]. The results of our study are more in line with the more recently published results of Merrell et al, with a 100% rate of union with low morbidity and good function [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Better functional outcomes were anticipated. However, reports of early results using the circular plate suggest higher complication rates when compared with traditional fixation techniques, including nonunion (25%-39%), implant breakage or back-out (7%-27%), and hardware impingement (22%-25%) [2,4,9,11]. Although higher fusion rates and fewer complications have been reported more recently by the developer of the device [6], some uncertainty exists regarding the effectiveness of circular plates because of the number of published reports to the contrary [2,4,9,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous evaluations of the Spider Plate have not controlled for this very important variable. In the study of Kendall et al [4], the bone graft source for 94% of their patients was either the excised scaphoid (16 of 18) or allograft (1 of 18). Likewise, Vance and colleagues [10] used the excised scaphoid in 20 of 27 patients (74%) who received the Spider Plate versus only 5 of 31 (16%) patients who received traditional fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiographic union was achieved in only 3 of these patients (63 % nonunion rate), and ROM, 46 % of contralateral, as well as grip strength, 56 % of contralateral, were inferior to the results previously reported for K-wire fixation [31]. As reported by Vance et al, 58 patients undergoing four-corner arthrodesis either by plate fixation (n027) or by traditional fixation (n031) were compared.…”
Section: Four-corner Arthrodesis-circular Platesmentioning
confidence: 90%