“…Those using quantitative approaches have reported increases in MCC awareness (Burnett et al, 2004; Chao et al, 2017) and knowledge (Chao et al, 2017; Midgett & Doumas, 2016; Midgett et al, 2016) competencies. Likewise, qualitative research highlighted the emergence of themes regarding MCC knowledge (Chao et al, 2017; Hipolito‐Delgado, Cook, Avrus, & Bonham, 2011; Koch, Ross, Wendell, & Aleksandrova‐Howell, 2014; Nilsson, Schale, & Khamphakdy‐Brown, 2011; Smith, Jennings, & Lakhan, 2014), awareness (Chao et al, 2017; Hipolito‐Delgado et al, 2011; Koch et al, 2014; K. A. Lee & Kelley‐Petersen, 2018; Smith et al, 2014), skills (Hipolito‐Delgado et al, 2011; Koch et al, 2014; Nilsson et al, 2011; Smith et al, 2014), and counseling relationship (Koch et al, 2014) concluding a CSL experience. Within these studies, scholars reinforce the lack of quantitative research comparing pedagogy or measuring student growth within a CSL course.…”