2013
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.106925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of infected total knee arthroplasty treated with arthroscopic debridement and continuous antibiotic irrigation system

Abstract: Background:Arthroscopic debridement with continuous irrigation system was used with success in treating infective arthritis. We evaluated the effectiveness of arthroscopic debridement coupled with antibiotic continuous irrigation system in acute presentation of late infected total knee arthroplasty.Materials and Methods:We performed a retrospective review of medical record of patients with acute presentation of late infected total knee arthroplasty who were treated by arthroscopic debridement coupled with cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63 Arthroscopic debridement and irrigation are not recommended as there the outcome is worse when compared with open surgical revision. 64,65 Its limitations are inability to perform adequate debridement and exchange of the mobile parts of the prosthesis. Not changing the mobile parts during DAIR is associated with high failure rates.…”
Section: Treatment Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 Arthroscopic debridement and irrigation are not recommended as there the outcome is worse when compared with open surgical revision. 64,65 Its limitations are inability to perform adequate debridement and exchange of the mobile parts of the prosthesis. Not changing the mobile parts during DAIR is associated with high failure rates.…”
Section: Treatment Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies chose open debridement and liner exchange [17, 20, 32, 41] while four studies performed arthroscopic debridement and liner retention [17, 20, 32, 41]. The success rate was 74% (128/173 cases, 95% CI: 67–81) and 66.67% (36/54 cases, 95% CI: 54–79), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After inclusion of the studies meeting two major criteria and no less than one minor criterion, the success rate of DAIR was 80.98% (149/184 cases, 95% CI: 75.3–86.7) [5, 6, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 29, 34, 37–39]. If the studies meeting two major criteria and two minor criteria were only included, the success rate of DAIR was 80.9% (72/89 cases, 95% CI: 73–89%) [5, 12, 29, 37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations