Gamma Knife Radiosurgery 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0583-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of Outpatient Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Primary Therapy of Acoustic Neuromas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,13,19,23 However, 97% of our patients did not require microsurgery, which is well within the range of the 95%-99% rates observed in other studies. 3,13,15,19 The CN complication and hearing preservation rates we observed here do not appear to be different from those reported in previous studies. 3,5,7,13 In the following, we will discuss several possible explanations for these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5,13,19,23 However, 97% of our patients did not require microsurgery, which is well within the range of the 95%-99% rates observed in other studies. 3,13,15,19 The CN complication and hearing preservation rates we observed here do not appear to be different from those reported in previous studies. 3,5,7,13 In the following, we will discuss several possible explanations for these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…3,13,15,19 The CN complication and hearing preservation rates we observed here do not appear to be different from those reported in previous studies. 3,5,7,13 In the following, we will discuss several possible explanations for these findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4,5,23,47,48 Despite the availability of published data that highlights the clinical, radiographic, and biological parameters when managing VS patients with radiosurgery, predicting hearing preservation after radiosurgery remains a challenge for practitioners. 14,36,40,[49][50][51][52] This difficulty may result from most studies having been small to modest in size, frequently from a single institution, and lacking statistical power and freedom from potential practitioner bias to draw firm conclusions. In our review we found impressive variations in reported hearing preservation outcomes for VS patients treated with radiosurgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%