Socio-demographic correlates of screening intention for colorectal cancer C olorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common internal malignancy affecting both men and women, and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in Australia.1-3 Reducing mortality from CRC has therefore become a national priority.2,4 Secondary prevention strategies, namely CRC screening, have been advocated as an effective method for the early identification of CRC. 2,5,6 Randomised controlled trials have reported that the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening can reduce mortality rates by 15-33% in average-risk populations.7-11 An examination of Australian data and screening outcomes for FOBT indicate that screening for CRC is comparable in cost to breast cancer screening.12 Based on such evidence, the Australian Health Technology Advisory Committee (AHTAC) report has called for urgent research into the feasibility of FOBT for a population-based CRC screening program.
2Screening participation rates of approximately 70% would be required to achieve sufficient benefits in terms of health and economic costs.13,14 However, the median adherence rate in programs offering FOBT screening is between 40% and 50%.
15Three Australian population-based surveys found that 10-28% of respondents intended to screen for CRC. [16][17][18] Two Australian surveys reported associations between screening intention for CRC and a number of socio-demographic and CRC experience factors. 17,18 However, these studies are limited because they were not designed to address the socio-demographic correlates of screening intention in a systematic and extensive manner.The aims of this study were two-fold: to examine current acceptance of populationbased CRC screening using FOBT; and to conduct a systematic and extensive assessment of the associations between screening intention and socio-demographic and CRC experience factors.
MethodsAccording to previous research, [16][17][18] approximately 1,130 eligible participants were required to be contacted, with the estimated screening intention rate of 0.28 (95% CI to be 0.015 on either side) and response rate of 0.75.A random sample of Queensland residents aged 40-80 years was stratified to include equal numbers of men and women and a rural-urban distribution proportional to the population. Of the 3,918 telephone numbers attempted, 2,782 were discarded (2,322 ineligible [not in the age range, etc] and 460 uncontactable). Some 884 interviews were completed from a total of 1,136 eligible participants, resulting in a response