2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(02)00053-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of the modeling of the topside electron density profile using the Chapman and Epstein functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chapman's shape factor exhibits a high correlation with the F 2 layer peak electron density and shows a strong solar cycle dependence during the late morning hours. Zhang et al () tried to model the topside ionosphere by fitting the α‐Chapman and Epstein functions, with a linearly variable effective scale height, to ISR profiles collected in Malvern (52.1°N, 2.3°W). They found that topside profiles can be fitted very well (about 94% of profiles met the criterion ε < 10%, ε being the percentage difference between modeled and measured topside electron density values) to a height of about 400 km above the F 2 peak using either functions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chapman's shape factor exhibits a high correlation with the F 2 layer peak electron density and shows a strong solar cycle dependence during the late morning hours. Zhang et al () tried to model the topside ionosphere by fitting the α‐Chapman and Epstein functions, with a linearly variable effective scale height, to ISR profiles collected in Malvern (52.1°N, 2.3°W). They found that topside profiles can be fitted very well (about 94% of profiles met the criterion ε < 10%, ε being the percentage difference between modeled and measured topside electron density values) to a height of about 400 km above the F 2 peak using either functions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of a height‐dependent scale height into a Chapman α or Chapman β layer can closely match the observed topside profile [ Fox , 1994; Zhang et al , 2002; Lei et al , 2004, 2005]. However, a detailed dependence of the topside scale height with height has not yet been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most established ionospheric models, the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model [11] and the NeQuick model [12] are not always able to properly represent the real features of the topside ionosphere [13]- [15]; therefore, further studies aimed at improving their topside representation are needed [16]. A part of the debate includes the choice of the mathematical function to use for the topside electron density vertical representation, the most popular being the Chapman [17] or Epstein [18], [19] families of functions [3], [20]- [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%