1980
DOI: 10.21236/ada096761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of the NTS Experiment: Phase II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have concluded (Der et al 1980a), however, that the level of high-frequency (f> 2 Hz) energy in the recordings of short-period signals is considerably above the level that could be attributed to non-linearity. Fourier analysis of steady state calibration signals, where the input level is considerably above the amplitude of most real signals, shows harmonics well below the spectral level of recorded teleseismic signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have concluded (Der et al 1980a), however, that the level of high-frequency (f> 2 Hz) energy in the recordings of short-period signals is considerably above the level that could be attributed to non-linearity. Fourier analysis of steady state calibration signals, where the input level is considerably above the amplitude of most real signals, shows harmonics well below the spectral level of recorded teleseismic signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We corrected for this difference in the spectral analysis, but the trace amplitudes and dominant wave periods at this station are not directly comparable to the rest of the stations. For further details we refer the reader to a more complete report (Der et al 1980a). …”
Section: The S D C S E X P E R I M E N Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results generally do not appear to explain the anomalies (DER et al, 1980). For example, LRSM stations were established at FAULTLESS, RULISON, and GASBUGGY epicenters to measure the relative attenuation in order to explain dm b 's with respect to dt a dierences.…”
Section: O-test-site Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value has been in popular use since then, if only because there was no compelling evidence for a different value. More recent work using digital short period instruments peaked at a higher frequency than the WWSSN short period (which is peaked at 1.4 htz) seems to indicate that t* could be substantially lower than 1 (e.g., Der, et al 1979), perhaps 0.5-0.6, and in some cases values of Thus, at f = 1 hz., allowing the range t* = 0.1 to t* 1.0 introduces a factor of %17 uncertainty in the amplitude. As the amplitudes of the P-waves are used to determine the yield, clearly the value of t* is of primary importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%