2001
DOI: 10.1080/010503901300007029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of total deafness treatment in young pre- and postlingually deafened

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our study show that auditory perception significantly improves over time ( table 3 ) confirming the outcomes of previously performed studies with smaller subject populations [3][4][5][6][7] . This shows the robustness of the tests.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of our study show that auditory perception significantly improves over time ( table 3 ) confirming the outcomes of previously performed studies with smaller subject populations [3][4][5][6][7] . This shows the robustness of the tests.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Recommended schedule of speech perception tests and questionnaires Test material Pre-operative First fitting 1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months Yearly Interval 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 etc. Results from individual clinics using the EARS assessment tool have already been published and show improved auditory perception over time in both homogenous and heterogeneous groups of CI users [3][4][5][6][7] . However, these studies demonstrating positive outcomes in speech perception skills have used children based at one or two clinics and have thus only allowed for small sample sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted individual differences even within a homogenous group. Similar scores were reported by Szuchnik et al (2001), even though the sample size was much smaller (16 children). However, they still reflect the results obtained in our study.…”
Section: Three-year Open-set Speech Recognition In Cochlear-implantedsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Another factor in this is that aetiology in congenitally deaf children is not necessarily known. Results have shown that postlingually deafened children show better results than peri-or pre-lingually deafened children (Szuchnik et al, 2001), which is an expected outcome, as these children have had some auditory experience and language development. Recently, selection criteria in children have changed to include those with severe hearing losses, with results reflecting better outcomes in these children (Cowan et al, 1997;Kiefer et al, 1998;Lenarz, 1998;Gordon et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Alguns deles com crianças provenientes de centros de implantação coclear e mesmo de diferentes países e utilizadoras de diferentes marcas de implantes cocleares. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Esta bateria de testes também foi utilizada para documentar o progresso e o benefício de crianças com défices associados. 19 Os vários estudos referidos sublinham a importância da monitorização do desenvolvimento da perceção auditiva em crianças utilizadoras de implantes cocleares, bem como o seu papel no que diz respeito ao prognóstico relativamente ao desenvolvimento da linguagem e da fala.…”
unclassified