Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures

Schulz, Arndt P.; Seide, K.; Queitsch, C.; Haugwitz, Andrea von; Meiners, J.; Kienast, B.; Tarabolsi, Mohamad; Kammal, Michael; Jürgens, Christian

doi:10.1002/rcs.161

Cited by 151 publications

(81 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Schulz et al reported heterotopic ossifications after robotic-milling THA were found in 27.8% of patients, although they had no control group [22]. In our series, heterotopic ossification was seen in 20 hips (26.6%) in the robotic-milling group.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 43%

“…There have been several reported complications with this system including soft tissue problems, gait abnormalities, and femoral fissures that have limited its use in Europe [22]. In 2003, Honl et al reported a higher dislocation rate of 18% and subsequent revision rate of 15% in a robotic-assisted group [15].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Europe, the first clinical use was in Germany in 1994. Since then, the system sometimes has received harsh criticism and as a result, ROBODOC is not in clinical use in Europe [22]. However, in August 2008, the ROBODOC system received 510(k) clearance from the US Food and Drug Administration [21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Comparison between Robotic-assisted and Manual Implantation of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Nakamura

Sugano

Nishii

et al. 2010

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

127

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The benefits of robotic techniques for implanting femoral components during THA are still controversial. Questions/Purposes The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the results and complications of robotic-assisted and hand-rasping stem implantation techniques. Method The minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 67 months; range, 60-85 months). One hundred forty-six primary THAs on 130 patients were included in this study. Robot-assisted primary THA was performed on 75 hips and a hand-rasping technique was used on 71 hips.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 43%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Comparison between Robotic-assisted and Manual Implantation of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Nakamura

Sugano

Nishii

et al. 2010

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

127

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…9 Subsequent applications in hip replacement and knee arthroplasty have demonstrated improved results with newer designs. 10,16,19 Applying the da Vinci robotic system, widely used in general surgery and urology, 8 has revealed that the device has limited application…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing skull base drill

Couldwell¹,

MacDonald²,

Thomas

et al. 2017

Neurosurgical Focus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors have developed a simple device for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) that uses an image-guided system to define a cutting tool path that is shared with a surgical machining system for drilling bone. Information from 2D images (obtained via CT and MRI) is transmitted to a processor that produces a 3D image. The processor generates code defining an optimized cutting tool path, which is sent to a surgical machining system that can drill the desired portion of bone. This tool has applications for bone removal in both cranial and spine neurosurgical approaches. Such applications have the potential to reduce surgical time and associated complications such as infection or blood loss. The device enables rapid removal of bone within 1 mm of vital structures. The validity of such a machining tool is exemplified in the rapid (< 3 minutes machining time) and accurate removal of bone for transtemporal (for example, translabyrinthine) approaches.

show abstract

“…As a result, robots have been increasingly included to assist the surgeon, including the orthopedic robot RoboDoc (Curexo Technology, Fremont, CA, USA) [10], the robotic system ZEUS [11], and the robotic Da Vinci system [12] used for minimally invasive surgery, the endovascular micro [13], and the intestinal capsule robot [14,15]. With the development of three-dimensional imaging, navigation, and medical robotics, robotic assistance for mandibular reconstructive surgery has been introduced.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An integrated system for planning, navigation and robotic assistance for mandible reconstruction surgery

Kong

Duan

Wang

2015

Intel Serv Robotics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mandibular reconstruction is an extremely complex and high-risk surgery. The aim of the study was to integrate robotics technology into mandibular reconstruction surgery as it can reduce surgeons' workload and improve the accuracy and quality of the surgery. In this study, we first introduced a mandibular reconstruction surgery robotic system, which includes integrated surgery planning, an optical navigation system, and a robot-assisted operation. Second, we addressed novel mandibular reconstruction surgery that is aided by a multi-arm robot with an optical navigation system. Finally, we conducted an accuracy test, a skull model experiment, and an animal experiment to evaluate the robotic system. Experiments showed that the robot's mean placement error was 1.0205 mm, which was acceptable for clinical application. We will continue to study this point, however, and plan to reduce the error eventually to 1.00 mm. The robot ran smoothly and accurately. It was also able to perform fibular segment implantation, positioning, and auxiliary fixation during mandibular reconstruction surgery.

show abstract

Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures

Abstract: Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty with the Orthodoc/ Robodoc system achieves equal results as compared to a manual technique. However, there was a high number of technical complications directly or indirectly related to the robot.

Cited by 151 publications

References 32 publications

A Comparison between Robotic-assisted and Manual Implantation of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

A Comparison between Robotic-assisted and Manual Implantation of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing skull base drill

An integrated system for planning, navigation and robotic assistance for mandible reconstruction surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About