2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results with 7.5F versus 10F rigid ureteroscopes in treatment of ureteral calculi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of small-calibre URS has been studied only in a few studies without any consensus in their results. [4,6,7] Yaycıoğlu et al [4] reported that duration of surgery was 57±35 min in small-calibre URS group, and 54±30 min in large-calibre URS group. Atis et al [7] found those durations as 32.7±5.8 and 30.2±5.4 min in small-calibre and large-calibre URS, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Use of small-calibre URS has been studied only in a few studies without any consensus in their results. [4,6,7] Yaycıoğlu et al [4] reported that duration of surgery was 57±35 min in small-calibre URS group, and 54±30 min in large-calibre URS group. Atis et al [7] found those durations as 32.7±5.8 and 30.2±5.4 min in small-calibre and large-calibre URS, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations on adults reported success rates of small-calibre URS between 84-89.8% while reported success rates of large-calibre URS were between 80-85.5%. [3,4,7] Atis et al [7] compared results of 4.5F semirigid URS and 8.5F rigid URS, and reported the success rates as 88.5% and 84.6%, respectively. The results of that study indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between success rates of small-and largecalibre URS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best surgical technique and energy source to be applied differs according to stone and patient characteristics. The ability to fragment any stone composition allied to a secure profile for the urinary tract and development of small fibers suitable for flexible endoscopy led the Holmium:Yttrium--Aluminum-Garnet Laser (Ho:YAG) to become the preferred energy source for stone breakdown during ureteroscopy (URS) (2)(3)(4)(5). In contrast, intracorporeal lithotripsy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and cystolithopaxy (CYS) is usually performed by ultrasonic or pneumatic devices as fragmentation and extraction can be performed with greater efficiency (6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%