2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RésuMatcher: A personalized résumé-job matching system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt the idea presented by Guo, Alamudun, and Hammond (2016). If the major in undergraduate's profile and research project's major requirement are the same, the major qualification score is 1.…”
Section: Requirement Filtering Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt the idea presented by Guo, Alamudun, and Hammond (2016). If the major in undergraduate's profile and research project's major requirement are the same, the major qualification score is 1.…”
Section: Requirement Filtering Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information extraction from resumes and job descriptions is one of the main areas of research in jobs and recruitment industry [26]- [28]. These works involve text mining, skill normalization, and developing similarity metrics for matching jobs and candidate profiles.…”
Section: B Job Recommendation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing recommendation systems in this domain focus on candidate selection by human resources rather than attracting job seekers through job recommendations which is the main goal of our paper [29], [30]. Existing automated job recommendation systems belong to either content-based applicant-job matcher approaches [28], [31], or user-based methods [32], [33].…”
Section: B Job Recommendation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…job recommender systems to help match the right candidate with the right job. Examples include CASPER [1], Proactive [2], FES [3], PROSPECT [4], eRecruiter [5], iHR [6], RésuMatcher [7] and the work of [8]. The work of [9] and [10] provides comprehensive review on job recommender systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%