2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2016.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resuming anticoagulant therapy after intracerebral bleeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, DOACs are associated with reductions in ICH, therein favoring their use in neurodegenerative diseases and in elderly patients. 46…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, DOACs are associated with reductions in ICH, therein favoring their use in neurodegenerative diseases and in elderly patients. 46…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 Early anticoagulant restarting may be optimal; however, individualized evaluations need to be carried out for all patients prior to selecting anticoagulant resumption time and intensity. 46 In addition, hypertension must be monitored as well as diabetes and other risk factors that are known to increase hemorrhagic risk. Hematologist’s consultation is advisable to identify malignancies or other potential causes of hemorrhagic diathesis.…”
Section: During Doacs Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not dispute that only the results of randomized, controlled trials will be able to provide clinically useful indications on whether and when to prescribe antithrombotic agents to ICH survivors, and whether DOACs can be used with less concerns about bleeding complications compared with warfarin, at least in patient with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. 23 However, several selection biases may potentially reduce these trials' overall external validity, an aspect that should be considered when translating their results into clinical practice and guidelines. 24,25 For the time being, therefore, our observational data from a real-world patient population support the hypothesis that while restarting anticoagulation after cerebral haemorrhage can be considered for secondary medical prophylaxis in patients at risk of thromboembolism without offsetting patient safety, a nihilistic approach appears not warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An observational study demonstrated that early OAC resumption (<2 weeks) could not improve the composite outcome (i.e., thromboembolic events, major bleeding events, and all-cause mortality), particularly because of an increased risk of major bleeding events [ 20 ]. Given these risks, some researchers have suggested that OAC should be avoided in the first 2 weeks after OAC-associated parenchymal ICH and resumption at 4 weeks if the cause of ICH has been amended or in patients with small ICH and high thromboembolic risk [ 63 ].…”
Section: Timing Of Restarting Oacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the timing of OAC restarting depends on individual clinical condition (i.e., the risks of thromboembolism and likelihood of recurrent ICH). For example, in patients with brainstem or cerebellar ICH, the timing should be delayed at least 8–10 weeks after the event [ 63 ]. On the other hand, in patients with prosthetic mechanical valves, who have a (very) high risk of thromboembolism, OAC is suggested to be resumed at 2 weeks after the onset of ICH or sooner if the hemorrhage burden is small and causative mechanism treated or stabilized.…”
Section: Timing Of Restarting Oacmentioning
confidence: 99%