Resurrecting the Hospital Autopsy: Impact of an Office of Decedent Affairs on Consent Rates, Providers, and Next-of-Kin

Abstract

Context.-Autopsy rates have decreased dramatically despite providing important clinical information to medical practices and social benefits to decedents' families.Objective.-To assess the impact of an institutional Office of Decedent Affairs (ODA), a direct communication link between pathology and decedents' families, on hospital autopsy consent rates, autopsy-related communication, practitioner views, and next-of-kin experiences.Design.-A before and after study involving all hospital decedents whose deaths did not fall within the jurisdiction of the medical examiner's office from 2013 to 2018. A pathology-run ODA launched in n May 2016 to guide nextof-kin through the hospital death process (including autopsy-related decisions) and serve as the next-of-kin's contact for any subsequent autopsy-related communication. Critical care and hematology/oncology practitioners were assessed for their autopsy-related views and decedents' next-of-kin were assessed for their autopsy-related experiences. Autopsy consent rates for non-medical examiner hospital deaths, autopsy-related communication rates, practitioner views on the role and value of autopsy, and next-of-kin autopsy experiences and decisions factors were compared prior to and after ODA launch.Results.-Autopsy consent rates significantly increased from 13.2% to 17.3% (480 of 3647 deaths versus 544 of 3148 deaths; P , .001). There were significant increases in the rate of autopsy-related discussions and bereavement counseling provided to decedents' families. Practitioner views on the positive role of autopsy for any hospital death and those with advanced stage cancer also significantly increased. Next-of-kin indicated more consistent autopsyrelated discussions with the potential benefits of autopsy discussed becoming key decision factors.Conclusions.-An ODA improves hospital autopsy consent rates, autopsy-related communication, providers' autopsy-related views, and next-of-kins' autopsy experiences.(Arch Pathol Lab Med.

Is Hospital Autopsy Auditing Suitable for Clinical Risk Manage ment? Actualities and Perspectives of Auditing in the Autopsy Room Following Italian Law 24/2017 on Patient Safety

“…Great efforts should be made in the future to improve this virtuous practice, and general practitioners need to be involved by relatives towards an awareness of the importance of autopsy [62,63]. The number of autopsies requested by families of the deceased is still low, and the promotion is needed in this respect.…”

Autopsy in a neonatal intensive care unit: do we still need it in 2022?

“… 8 , 11 In most settings, the neonatologist will provide the information obtained to the parents, but in adults, direct communication between pathologists and family has been shown to be very effective. 12 Most studies indicate that the number of parents who regret not giving consent is much larger than the percentage of parents who did give consent for autopsy. 8 , 11 This is also shown in autopsies of stillborn infants.…”

COVID-19: A pandemic of values and more

“…For example, how many post-mortems have been performed on COVID-19 patients? Post-mortem examinations are the highest level of quality control for an institution, especially a university hospital, with or without imaging 3 and it is an invaluable tool for expanding our knowledge of this and any other disease. For instance, although we have information from the multiple studies now underway, when will we have a safe and effective vaccine?…”