2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ReSync: Correcting the trial-to-trial asynchrony of event-related brain potentials to improve neural response representation

Abstract: For various reasons, the brain response activities in EEG signals are not perfectly synchronized from trial to trial with respect to event markers -a problem commonly referred to as ERP latency jitter. EEG experimental technologies have been greatly advanced to reduce technical timing errors so as to reduce the jitter. However, there are intrinsic sources of jitter that are difficult, if not impossible, to remove. The problem becomes more complicated when facing multiple sub-components with different jitter. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not have a specific explanation of the differences between the studies finding no latency differences and those that do. Our method for computing ERP N170 latency are based on individual participant peak‐picking and the ReSync procedure (Guy, Conte, Bursalıoğlu, & Richards, 2021; Ouyang, 2020). This is the most accurate method for ERP component latency measurements, as it considers component latency on individual trial‐by‐trial basis to identify each participant's median component latency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not have a specific explanation of the differences between the studies finding no latency differences and those that do. Our method for computing ERP N170 latency are based on individual participant peak‐picking and the ReSync procedure (Guy, Conte, Bursalıoğlu, & Richards, 2021; Ouyang, 2020). This is the most accurate method for ERP component latency measurements, as it considers component latency on individual trial‐by‐trial basis to identify each participant's median component latency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latency of the ERP components was computed with semi‐automated peak‐picking methods (Guy et al, 2021) and the ReSync procedure (Guy et al, 2021; Ouyang, 2020). The grand average ERP for each participant and trial type (upright faces, upright houses, inverted faces, inverted houses) was computed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we take the start time point of the window that minimizes the GMD values as the latency. To enhance the ERP feature, a single-trial EEG model is constructed by a linear decomposition of several ERP components with latency-variable [25,30], which can be expressed as:…”
Section: Similarity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woody et al proposed an adaptive filter system to analyze the variable latencies of ERP components. To improve the performance of ERP components detection, the latencies of ERP were estimated by the cross-correlation method, and the EEG signal was aligned by latencies [24,25]. Song et al proposed an iterative minimum distance square error for ERP feature alignment, which constructs an ERP template to compensate for possible time jitter [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%