2017
DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa54a8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resynchronization of the Asynchronous Polar CD Ind

Abstract: CD Ind is one of only four confirmed asynchronous polars (APs). APs are strongly magnetic cataclysmic variables of the AM Herculis subclass with the characteristic that their white dwarfs rotate a few per cent out of synchronism with their binary orbit. Theory suggests that nova eruptions disrupt previously synchronized states. Following the eruption, the system is expected to rapidly resynchronize over a timescale of centuries. The other three asynchronous polars -V1432 Aql, BY Cam and V1500 Cyg -have resynch… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The full light curve shows variability on many different timescales, the most obvious being the repeating features every ∼7.3 days. The variation in the flux corresponds to ∼2.5 mag, which is comparable with the variation found by Myers et al (2017). In Figure 2 we show the light curve covering the first beat cycle.…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The full light curve shows variability on many different timescales, the most obvious being the repeating features every ∼7.3 days. The variation in the flux corresponds to ∼2.5 mag, which is comparable with the variation found by Myers et al (2017). In Figure 2 we show the light curve covering the first beat cycle.…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In our following analysis we have assumed P or b = 110.8124 min and P spin = 109.6525 min (Myers et al 2017), which imply a beat period of 7.3 d. It should be noted, that the orbital period value (110.82005 min) quoted in (Myers et al 2017) is not compatible with the value implied by their quoted orbital frequency (110.81237 min). Moreover, their quoted spin frequency (13.1324 cyc/d, section 3.3) is not in agreement with the spin period quoted in section 3.1 (109.6564 min).…”
Section: Modelling Of the Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations