2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retained abdominal gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These spilled stones should normally be retrieved during the procedure, but inability to retrieve them is an accepted situation. 1,2 The rate of complications occurring from these unretrieved stones is about 0.3% of patients. 3 Complications can, however, be serious and include intra-abdominal abscess formation, obstruction or fistulation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spilled stones should normally be retrieved during the procedure, but inability to retrieve them is an accepted situation. 1,2 The rate of complications occurring from these unretrieved stones is about 0.3% of patients. 3 Complications can, however, be serious and include intra-abdominal abscess formation, obstruction or fistulation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prospective study over a 7-year period of 106 patients who had gallstone spillage, none developed complications directly related to adhesions. 41 Similarly, Manukian et al 42 reported on 21 such patients who were followed up for a period of 121 months. None of these patients had any complication related to adhesion formation.…”
Section: Gallstone Spillage During Cholecystectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] Gallstones are retained 1-13% of the time, and complications develop in 0.08-2.9% of cases. 1 rate of complications due to lost gallstones higher in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy than in open Cholecystectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%