2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4951-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retained executive abilities in mild cognitive impairment are associated with increased white matter network connectivity

Abstract: Purpose To describe structural network differences in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with high versus low executive abilities, as reflected by measures of white matter connectivity using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Materials and methods This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Of the 128 participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database who had both a DTI scan as well as a diagnosis of MCI, we used an executive function score to classify the top 15 scori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, structural and functional network changes during the progression of AD have been evaluated using MRI-based connectomics applied to a rat model of AD. Differences in the structural brain network between population at risk of AD or in its preclinical phases in human cohorts have been already reported (Berlot et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2015;Farrar et al, 2017;Fischer et al, 2015;Pereira et al, 2017;Zhao et al, 2015). In our study, the evaluation of the structural brain network in TgF344-AD from ages corresponding to earlier stages than the ones covered in human studies pointed to similar connectivity changes already in young animals (six months of age).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, structural and functional network changes during the progression of AD have been evaluated using MRI-based connectomics applied to a rat model of AD. Differences in the structural brain network between population at risk of AD or in its preclinical phases in human cohorts have been already reported (Berlot et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2015;Farrar et al, 2017;Fischer et al, 2015;Pereira et al, 2017;Zhao et al, 2015). In our study, the evaluation of the structural brain network in TgF344-AD from ages corresponding to earlier stages than the ones covered in human studies pointed to similar connectivity changes already in young animals (six months of age).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The observed significant relation between structural network metrics and cognitive performance could be related with the ability of functional connectivity to cope with the structural disconnection preserving cognition, until a breakpoint when it is not able to deal with extensive structural network damage. This relationship between structural connectivity and cognition has been also described in MCI subjects (Berlot et al, 2016;Farrar et al, 2017) and in cognitive normal individuals harboring amyloid pathology and neurodegeneration (Pereira et al, 2017), while no correlation was observed in control subjects. Coherently, structural connectivity did not correlate with DNMS in our control cohort, where correlation between DNMS and functional connectivity was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Additionally, we noted that smaller mid-posterior CC volume was related to worse executive function. This relationship suggests that CC degeneration might contribute to or even accelerate cognitive deficit ( Agosta et al, 2015 ; Farrar et al, 2017 ; Luo et al, 2017b ). Combined with the results of bilateral hypometabolism and inter-hemispheric disconnection, we hypothesized that mid-posterior CC atrophy may reflect the Wallerian degeneration secondary to neuronal loss caused by amyloid deposition ( Bozzali et al, 2002 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other network measures such as network size [11], density [11], PageRank versatility [12], path length [10] and modularity [10] can further be used to evaluate networks. For an extensive review of network measures, the reader is referred to [13].…”
Section: Systems Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%