Retaining participants in community-based health research: a case example on standardized planning and reporting

Abstract

Background: Effective strategies for participant retention are critical in health research to ensure validity, generalizability and efficient use of resources. Yet standardized guidelines for planning and reporting on retention efforts have been lacking. As with randomized controlled trial (RCT) and systematic review (SR) protocols, retention protocols are an opportunity to improve transparency and rigor. An RCT being conducted in British Columbia (BC), Canada provides a case example for developing a priori retention frameworks for use in protocol planning and reporting. Methods: The BC Healthy Connections Project RCT is examining the effectiveness of a nurse home-visiting program in improving child and maternal outcomes compared with existing services. Participants (N = 739) were girls and young women preparing to parent for the first time and experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Quantitative data were collected upon trial entry during pregnancy and during five follow-up interviews until participants' children reached age 2 years. A framework was developed to guide retention of this study population throughout the RCT. We reviewed relevant literature and mapped essential retention activities across the study planning, recruitment and maintenance phases. Interview completion rates were tracked. Results: Results from 3302 follow-up interviews (in-person/telephone) conducted over 4 years indicate high completion rates: 90% (n = 667) at 34 weeks gestation; and 91% (n = 676), 85% (n = 626), 80% (n = 594) and 83% (n = 613) at 2, 10, 18 and 24 months postpartum, respectively. Almost all participants (99%, n = 732) provided ongoing consent to access administrative health data. These results provide preliminary data on the success of the framework. Conclusions: Our retention results are encouraging given that participants were experiencing considerable socioeconomic disadvantage. Standardized retention planning and reporting may therefore be feasible for health research in general, using the framework we have developed. Use of standardized retention protocols should be encouraged in research to promote consistency across diverse studies, as now happens with RCT and SR protocols. Beyond this, successful retention approaches may help inform health policy-makers and practitioners who also need to better reach, engage and retain underserved populations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01672060. Registered on 24 August 2012.

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in individuals with pre-existing mental illness

“…establishing a rapport, regular follow-up interviews) could be effective strategies. 42 We also identified that number of years since recruitment was associated with increased odds of not responding to the survey (Supplementary Table 2), suggesting that efforts to engage more longstanding members of the NCMH cohort will be particularly important.…”

Effect of early childhood development interventions delivered by healthcare providers to improve cognitive outcomes in children at 0–36 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…After assessing inclusion and exclusion criteria, 97 papers reporting on 42 trials were included in the narrative synthesis, of which 27 trials were included in the meta-analyses (online supplemental appendix 5). 15 35–130 Online supplemental appendix 3 displays the outcomes and scales reported by each study and those included in the meta-analyses. Online supplemental appendix 6 shows the ongoing studies.…”

“…Of the 42 trials, 38 were individual RCTs,37 38 44–49 54–77 79–122 124–129 and 4 were cluster RCTs15 35 36 39–43 50–53 78 123 130 (table 2). Thirty-three trials were conducted in HICs44–49 54–67 69–77 79–97 100 103 105–108 111–119 121 122 125 126 128 and eight were conducted in LMICs (Pakistan, Bangladesh, South Africa, Columbia, Jamaica, Brazil, India and Zambia) 15 35–38 41–43 50–53 68 78 96 98 99 101 102 104 109 110 120 123 124 127 129 130…”

Exposure to ultra-processed foods during pregnancy and ultrasound fetal growth parameters

“…First, pregnant women who missed ultrasound examinations were from poorer households and more frequently smoked. Attrition is a common issue in cohort studies, with a more successful follow-up among better-off and healthier participants (46) . Even though 78 % of those eligible were included in this study and no significant association was observed between UPF consumption and wealth index or smoking, a role for these factors in affecting fetal size is recognised (47) .…”