1992
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention and disruption of motion information in visual short-term memory.

Abstract: Velocity discrimination thresholds for drifting luminance gratings were measured as a function of the time interval between test and reference gratings, using a two-interval, forced-choice procedure. Discrimination thresholds, expressed as Weber fractions (delta V/V), were independent of interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 1-30 s, demonstrating perfect short-term retention of velocity information. When a third grating was briefly presented halfway through a 10-s ISI, memory masking was observed. Discri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

19
96
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
19
96
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In healthy human observers, velocity information can be stored in visual memory with perfect accuracy for periods up to 30 set (Magnussen and Greenlee, 1992). These results are replicated by our control group who show no tendency for thresholds to increase when the IS1 is lengthened from 1 to 10 sec.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In healthy human observers, velocity information can be stored in visual memory with perfect accuracy for periods up to 30 set (Magnussen and Greenlee, 1992). These results are replicated by our control group who show no tendency for thresholds to increase when the IS1 is lengthened from 1 to 10 sec.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These results are replicated by our control group who show no tendency for thresholds to increase when the IS1 is lengthened from 1 to 10 sec. The perfect storage of stimulus velocity information can be disturbed by introducing a "memory masker" during the retention interval (Magnussen and Greenlee, 1992). Interestingly, the memory masking effect was greatest for maskers differing along the velocity dimension, whereas it was independent of the relative direction of the masker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these tests a subject is asked to compare two stimuli that are separated by some amount of time. The general result of this research has been that the amount of time separating these two stimuli has little or no effect on the discrimination threshold (Bennett & Cortese, 1996;Blake, Cepeda, & Hiris, 1997;Greenlee, Rischewski, Mergner, & Seeger, 1993;Lee & Harris, 1996;Magnussen & Dyrnes, 1994;Magnussen & Greenlee, 1992;Magnussen, Greenlee, Asplund, & Dyrnes, 1990, 1991Magnussen, Greenlee, & Thomas, 1996;Magnussen, Idås, & Myhre, 1998;Magnussen, Landrø, & Johnsen, 1985;Nilson & Nelson, 1981;Regan, 1985;Vogels & Orban, 1986). These findings have been taken as evidence for very good or even "perfect" memory (Magnussen, 2000;Magnussen & Greenlee, 1999;Reinvang, Magnussen, Greenlee, & Larsson, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Visual persistence or iconic memory refers to the retention of perceptual experience, which can be recalled if not masked within a very short period of time (Ͻ0.5 s) (1)(2)(3)(4). Visual short-term memory, persisting for seconds, was demonstrated in visual discrimination tasks in humans for image features such as spatial frequency (5,6), orientation (7), and direction of motion (8). Exposure to a visual stimulus also has a persisting effect on sensory detection related to receding visual targets, without the observer consciously recalling the first (prime) stimulus-a phenomenon termed repetition priming (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%