Retention Management Of Critical (Core) Employees A Challenging Issue Confronting Organisations In The 21st Century

Abstract

Employee retention is one of the challenges facing many business organisations today. Many industries are afflicted with high demand for specialised employees and are also suffering high levels of turnover. We have moved into a knowledge-based society where human capital is considered a key resource and a competitive business advantage. The high attrition rate of critical (core) employees is costly to corporations. Loss of these high talent employees results in the stripping of valuable human capital, critical skills and institutional memory. Consequently, companies are giving increased attention to ways of retaining their high performing employees rather than relying on costly replacement and retraining. New paradigm companies recognise that an important element in business management practices is the need to successfully motivate and retain employees who survive organisational restructuring, downsizing, consolidation, reorganising or re-engineering initiatives. This paper examines the current human resource practices on the retention of core employees in twelve Australian organisations. It explores the relationship between human resource (HR) practices and retention and further identifies the elements of HR practices, which strongly influence the decision for core employees to stay. It is part of a three phased study and the methodologies discussed in this paper consist of a) a Delphi survey of expert opinions and b) an in-depth interview of HR Managers of organisations. Results from this study will assist in the development of an effective HRM retention program for organisations. Businesses can successfully keep critical employees with a total retention strategy and HR programs to support it.

The impact of human resource management and educational innovation on employees' organizational commitment: A case study at Saigon International University, Vietnam

“…There are many studies on employee retention in various industries and its causal relationship to HR activities (Fuad et al, 2020) [17] . Furthermore, 68% believe that retaining talented employees is more important than recruiting new employees (Chew, 2004) [13] . In summary, the author proposes the hypothesis as follows:…”

Designing the profile of industrial consumers of renewable energy in Romania under the impact of the overlapping crisis

“…In spite of the fact that nowadays the concept of digitalization is a very popular one, there are still many industry branches which have been affected by the lack of a high demand of specialized personnel. This has taken the toll on the any business turnover in general (Chew & Entrekin, 2011). Their value and uniqueness rely on the "silent expertise" which could be valuable for the competition whereas these abilities and knowledge have to do with the core internal developed processes which have been shaped throughout time (Entrekin & Court 2001).…”

Shared Goal, Communication and Absence of Damaging Conflicts as Antecedents of Employee Relationship Strength at Institutions of Higher Learning in South Africa

“…However informal communication is more credible than the formal one as it allows team flexibility, open discussion, better flow of ideas and greater efficiency and productivity (Clamns, 2008). Kelly (2007) and Chew and Entrekin (2011) assert that communication with employees strengthens their identification with the institution and creates institutional solidarity due to trust among employees or between different departments. Kelly (2007) therefore promotes open and clear lines of communication within the institution so that there is free flow of knowledge creation and sharing.…”

“…Institutional communication creates trust and commitment which are the underlying elements in employer-employee relationships and this has an effect of strengthening the psychological contract between the two (Chew & Entrekin, 2011). A study of perceptions and emotional experiences in supervisor-subordinate relationships by Tse and Troth (2013) endorsed the relationship between institutional communication and employee relationships.…”