1971
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-629104-9.50008-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention of Discriminations and an Analysis of Learning Set1 1This chapter is based very largely on a doctoral dissertation by the first author (Bessemer, 1967) and directed jointly by Harry F. Harlow and John W. Davenport. We thank Jacqueline Conner, Donald R. Meyer, Allan M. Schrier, and Robert R. Zimmermann for providing material prior to publication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 89 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjects trained on repeated reversals may become able to generalize that reward contingencies can be reversed, which is sometimes referred to as the principle of reversal (Shettleworth, 1998). In deterministic two-choice serial reversal-learning tasks, subjects may optimize performance by acquiring the win-stay, lose-shift (WSLS) strategy (Warren, 1966; for discussion, see Bessemer & Stollnitz, 1971), in which the subject repeats the response from the previous trial if that choice was rewarded (i.e., if win , then stay ) but switches to the alternative response if that choice was not rewarded (i.e., if lose , then shift ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects trained on repeated reversals may become able to generalize that reward contingencies can be reversed, which is sometimes referred to as the principle of reversal (Shettleworth, 1998). In deterministic two-choice serial reversal-learning tasks, subjects may optimize performance by acquiring the win-stay, lose-shift (WSLS) strategy (Warren, 1966; for discussion, see Bessemer & Stollnitz, 1971), in which the subject repeats the response from the previous trial if that choice was rewarded (i.e., if win , then stay ) but switches to the alternative response if that choice was not rewarded (i.e., if lose , then shift ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%