2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
194
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
194
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Whitehead et al further supported this view when they found higher bacterial counts on substrates that contained 2 µm diameter pits as opposed to those in the range of 0.5 µm. 75 Xu et al compared bacterial adhesion between two polyurethane surfaces of the same chemistry; one was smooth and the other contained oriented protrusions or pillars (400 nm diameter × 650 nm height). 76 They found biofilm formation significantly less for both S. epidermidis and S. aureus when using the highly textured polyurethane.…”
Section: Nanostructured Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whitehead et al further supported this view when they found higher bacterial counts on substrates that contained 2 µm diameter pits as opposed to those in the range of 0.5 µm. 75 Xu et al compared bacterial adhesion between two polyurethane surfaces of the same chemistry; one was smooth and the other contained oriented protrusions or pillars (400 nm diameter × 650 nm height). 76 They found biofilm formation significantly less for both S. epidermidis and S. aureus when using the highly textured polyurethane.…”
Section: Nanostructured Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having said this, they also correctly state that these surfaces are not fully stable and as a result require further investigation. Ion sputtering technologies have also been implemented for the capture and immobilization of bacterial cells, as shown in the research conducted by Whitehead et al [174,175]. This research on the capture and immobilization of bacterial cells has shown how micrometre-scale features on silicon and titanium can give rise to controlled bacterial adhesion and growth in specific, discrete areas.…”
Section: Ion Beam and Electron Beam Processingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This ultimately indicates that EB processing can be used in applications such as biosensors and tissue engineering devices. Ion beam technology has also been employed to produce various topographies and surface chemistries, mainly through the use of ion beam sputtering [173][174][175] but ion beam etching has also been effectively employed [176]. Trujillo et al [173] have shown that ion beam sputtered silver-doped hydroxyapatite on titanium can have the advantage of hindering Staphylococcus epidermis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth.…”
Section: Ion Beam and Electron Beam Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Anselme [49] showed a relationship between roughness and adherent bacteria number on polyurethane-coated glass plates preconditioned in seawater. Whitehead et al [50] & Campoccia et al [51] studied this subject by testing different pits with specific diameter and depth, whereas in our assay, the marks were irregular on the plates and the results expressed as displacement and not bacteria number; in the first study, there was an increase of adherent bacteria number on rough surfaces, especially on the bottom of crevices [52], although the lowest number was obtained on the larger pit, but in the second one, no differences were observed. In addition, some authors have proposed that bacterial response to nanometer scale roughness is mediated by structures such as fimbriae [48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%