Nine-year-old children were required to read descriptive passages presented with or without line drawings of the subjects of those passages. Immediate and delayed free recall performance was higher following presentation with pictures than without. Reading times and errors for the passages were not affected by the presence of pictures. Inclusion of color and additional detail within the pictures had no effect on any of the measures analyzed. The presence of pictures increased the recall of both pictorial and nonpictorial features from the passages. It was concluded that pictures playa significant role in the enhancement of children's retention of prose passages.The last decade has seen an increasing interest in research concerned with reading development, decoding, and comprehension, and with the variety of skills and strategies that may affect these abilities. However, despite the prominence of pictures in books used to teach children to read, there has been little work on pictures as an aid in learning to read. Harzem, Lee, and Miles (1976) concluded that pictures were positively detrimental. However, the task they gave children was learning to read single words aloud with or without pictures. Since in the picture condition, the child could respond correctly by naming the picture, it is not surprising that he learned less about how to read the word aloud than in a word-only condition. Distracting effects of pictures on oral reading reported by Willows (1978, in press) are similarly more relevant to questions concerning attention than to those concerning effects of pictures on learning to understand print.Studies by Miller (1938) and Peeck (1974) suggest, respectively, that pictures do not facilitate comprehension, and that they have an adverse effect on the retention of information. If this is so, it is surprising, given much recent work on memory. Pictorial stimuli are recalled better than verbal stimuli (Nelson, Reed,